Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Marwa, Soffa
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Losing Human Life from an Economic Perspective Marwa, Soffa; Mandala, Subianta
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 10 (2025): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i10.572

Abstract

This study analyzes in depth the implementation of restorative justice (RJ) in the crime of killing a person in Indonesia from an economic perspective. Using qualitative methods with normative legal and conceptual approaches, and secondary data analysis, this study examines the potential benefits and challenges of implementing RJ in murder cases. The results of the analysis show that RJ has the potential to offer social and economic benefits—such as better victim recovery, potential reduction in long-term criminal justice system costs, and reduced recidivism—compared to retributive approaches. However, its implementation in Indonesia faces significant obstacles, including regulatory fragmentation, institutional resistance, public perception, and limited resources and local empirical data. While immediate cost savings may be limited for serious cases, the potential long-term socio-economic benefits of recovery and social cohesion could be substantial. Effective implementation requires legal harmonization, resource investment, paradigm shift, and the development of clear guidelines. The findings of this study highlight the economic and social potential of implementing restorative justice (RJ) in Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly in cases of homicide. From an economic perspective, RJ could reduce the long-term costs associated with the criminal justice process, such as incarceration and administrative expenses, by focusing on rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders.
Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Losing Human Life from an Economic Perspective Marwa, Soffa; Mandala, Subianta
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 10 (2025): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i10.572

Abstract

This study analyzes in depth the implementation of restorative justice (RJ) in the crime of killing a person in Indonesia from an economic perspective. Using qualitative methods with normative legal and conceptual approaches, and secondary data analysis, this study examines the potential benefits and challenges of implementing RJ in murder cases. The results of the analysis show that RJ has the potential to offer social and economic benefits—such as better victim recovery, potential reduction in long-term criminal justice system costs, and reduced recidivism—compared to retributive approaches. However, its implementation in Indonesia faces significant obstacles, including regulatory fragmentation, institutional resistance, public perception, and limited resources and local empirical data. While immediate cost savings may be limited for serious cases, the potential long-term socio-economic benefits of recovery and social cohesion could be substantial. Effective implementation requires legal harmonization, resource investment, paradigm shift, and the development of clear guidelines. The findings of this study highlight the economic and social potential of implementing restorative justice (RJ) in Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly in cases of homicide. From an economic perspective, RJ could reduce the long-term costs associated with the criminal justice process, such as incarceration and administrative expenses, by focusing on rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders.
Perbandingan Model Kepemimpinan Presiden dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat terhadap Pembentukan Kebijakan Hukum Marwa, Soffa; Zainal Arifin Hoesein
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 06 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i06.2031

Abstract

Perbedaan karakter kepemimpinan presiden dalam sistem presidensial Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat merupakan isu penting dalam kajian hukum tata negara, terutama terkait pengaruhnya terhadap proses dan arah pembentukan kebijakan hukum nasional. Meskipun sama-sama menganut sistem presidensial, kedua negara memiliki konstruksi konstitusional, tradisi hukum, serta relasi kekuasaan yang berbeda antara presiden dan lembaga legislatif, yang berdampak langsung pada dinamika politik hukum. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan model kepemimpinan presiden dalam sistem presidensial Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat serta implikasinya terhadap pembentukan kebijakan hukum nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum dan pendekatan konstitusional, melalui kajian terhadap konstitusi, peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, dan literatur hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa presiden di Indonesia memiliki peran yang relatif lebih dominan dalam proses legislasi melalui mekanisme persetujuan bersama dengan legislatif, sementara presiden Amerika Serikat menjalankan kepemimpinan yang lebih dibatasi oleh prinsip checks and balances dengan Congress. Perbedaan tersebut tercermin dalam pola relasi eksekutif-legislatif serta mekanisme pembentukan kebijakan hukum. Artikel ini berkontribusi secara ilmiah dalam memperkuat pemahaman politik hukum nasional berbasis kepemimpinan konstitusional serta memberikan perspektif komparatif bagi pengembangan sistem presidensial yang demokratis dan berkeadilan.
Co-Authors Subianta Mandala, Subianta Zainal Arifin Hoesein