Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan
Roisul Umam Arrasyidi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Use of Storytelling Method in Teaching English with Islamic Content (Case Study of Modern Islamic Boarding School): Penelitian Mella Erdianti; Silva Maysarah; Kariri Anwar; Roisul Umam Arrasyidi
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 3 Nomor 4 (April 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.937

Abstract

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of the storytelling method in teaching English based on Islamic content in modern Islamic boarding schools. The background of this study is the need to integrate foreign language education with the instillation of Islamic values ​​without eliminating the identity of Islamic boarding schools as Islamic educational institutions. This study uses a qualitative case study approach with observation, interview, and documentation techniques as data collection methods. The results of the study indicate that the storytelling method not only improves students' communicative language skills but also functions as a means of conveying Islamic values ​​in a subtle, contextual, and non-boring manner. Islamic-themed stories delivered in English are able to foster interest in learning, shape character, and deepen students' religious understanding. In addition, this method is considered relevant to today's learning needs because it supports a humanistic and contextual approach. In conclusion, storytelling is an effective and flexible method for combining language learning with internalization of Islamic values ​​in a modern and enjoyable learning atmosphere.
BETWEEN SHARIA ARBITRATION AND RELIGIOUS COURTS: JURISDICTIONAL CONFLICT AND JUDICIAL CONSIDERATIONS ON ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN SUPREME COURT DECISIONS Muhammad Fakhril Umam; Dhika Tabrozi; Roisul Umam Arrasyidi; Wijdan Hibatulloh al-Wafa
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/mawarid.vol8.iss1.art10

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to analyze the conflict of jurisdiction between the National Sharia Arbitration Board (Basyarnas) and the Religious Courts in the resolution of sharia economic disputes, particularly regarding the effectiveness of arbitration clauses when such institutions are not structurally available in certain regions. The focus of the study is directed at the judges’ legal considerations in Supreme Court Decisions No. 159 K/Ag/2021 and No. 175 K/Ag/2021. Methods - The research employs a normative legal method using a statutory and case study approach, focusing on Supreme Court Decisions No. 159 K/Ag/2021 and No. 175 K/Ag/2021. The analysis utilizes Friedman’s legal system theory and Radbruch’s legal objectives to examine the rationality of the judges’ considerations. Findings - The results of this study found that the structural absence of Basyarnas in a region constitutes the primary ratio decidendi for judges to assume adjudicatory authority. Within Friedman’s framework, there is an interaction between the limitations of the legal structure and a responsive legal culture, which prompts judges to engage in legal discovery through the interpretation of Article 1344 of the Civil Code. Based on Radbruch’s conceptual framework, the judge’s legal balancing, in its implications, incorporates legal objectives within a framework aimed at achieving substantive justice for the aggrieved party; the utility-oriented nature of the decision provides practical benefits for the disputing parties; and certainty ensures that regulations are clearly formulated and not open to multiple interpretations, thereby providing legal certainty for the litigants as subjects of law. Research contribution/limitations - This study is limited to a normative analysis of specific cases; therefore, generalizations are limited. Originality/value - This study demonstrates that under conditions of institutional limitations, judges tend to prioritize substantive justice and the effectiveness of dispute resolution over formal legal certainty
Co-Authors Dhika Tabrozi Kariri Anwar Mella Erdianti Muhammad Fakhril Umam Silva Maysarah Wijdan Hibatulloh al-Wafa