Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal Of Synergi In Law, Criminal And Justice International Journal of Society and Law
T Riza Zarzani N
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Application of Health Law in Narcotics Rehabilitation Programs by Reporting Recipient Institutions Indra Kurniyawan; Marice Simarmata; T Riza Zarzani N
International Journal of Society and Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Multidimensi Kreatif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abusers and victims of narcotics abuse have the right to receive rehabilitation in accordance with applicable regulations. The application of health law in narcotics rehabilitation programs by Mandatory Reporting Institutions (IPWL) is a very important effort in helping abusers and victims of narcotics abuse. The program focuses not only on physical recovery from medical problems, but also on mental and social recovery. IPWLs appointed by the government must carry out rehabilitation programs for abusers and victims of narcotics abuse in accordance with the standards that have been set. The goal is to restore the condition of abusers and victims of narcotics abuse so that they can integrate themselves back into society and function socially. The standard of rehabilitation services set by the government covers various aspects such as methods, duration, facilities, and costs, this aims to ensure that each individual receives treatment that suits his or her needs. The legal framework underlying this program is Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Permenkes No. 17 of 2023 concerning Amendments to Permenkes No. 4 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of IPWL. Minister of Health Regulation No. 17 of 2023 which requires medical and social rehabilitation for abusers and victims of narcotics abuse. Through a normative juridical approach, this study highlights various problems regarding the application of health law for abusers and victims of narcotics abuse, therapy for appropriate treatment, and understanding the financing mechanism of accepted therapies. The results of this study are expected to be able to provide an analysis of the effectiveness of the implementation of health law, as well as identify appropriate therapies in the rehabilitation of drug abusers and victims of drug abuse and understand the mechanism in financing it.
CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR NON-MUSLIMS IN ACEH Nurochman Nulhakim; T Riza Zarzani N
International Journal of Synergy in Law, Criminal, and Justice Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): SLP-IJSLCJ
Publisher : PT. Sinergi Legal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70321/ijslcj.v2i3.151

Abstract

This study examines the legal and sociological implications of the implementation of the Qanun on Jinayat Law against non-Muslims in Aceh within the framework of the national legal system and efforts to realize substantive justice. The application of the qanun to non-Muslims is legally legitimized through Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Governance of Aceh, specifically Article 129, which provides a legal basis for voluntary and automatic submission. However, the mechanism of submission in practice often raises serious problems, because choices that are normatively called voluntary are in reality often merely formalities due to social pressures or pragmatic considerations. This phenomenon creates a dilemma between formal legal certainty and the protection of the basic rights of non-Muslims guaranteed by the constitution. Sociologically, non-Muslims in Aceh are more likely to submit to the Qanun Jinayat (Islamic Law) than to the Criminal Code (KUHP), as caning is seen as a lighter, quicker punishment, and carries less long-term stigma than imprisonment. However, this choice is not a form of substantive acceptance, but rather a coping strategy reflecting social pressure and potential discrimination. This raises critical questions about the extent to which regional laws can harmonize with the constitutional principles of equality before the law and non-discrimination. The research findings indicate that the application of the Qanun Jinayat to non-Muslims is legally valid, but constitutionally and sociologically problematic. To realize substantive justice in Indonesia's rule of law, a clear and transparent reformulation of the submission mechanism is required, along with strict oversight by the central government to prevent Aceh's special autonomy from giving rise to discriminatory practices. Thus, legal pluralism in Indonesia can operate in harmony with the principles of a democratic rule of law that guarantees the protection of the rights of all citizens without exception.
Co-Authors Indra Kurniyawan Marice Simarmata Nurochman Nulhakim