Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Collegium Studiosum Journal
Qadri, Rahmat Tul
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
INKONSISTENSI HUKUM PENGATURAN PENGEMBALIAN UANG HASIL KORUPSI DARI PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM Qadri, Rahmat Tul; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Winstar, Yelia Nathassa
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1674

Abstract

From the perspective of legal certainty, inconsistency in the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds can create uncertainty in the implementation of the law and the legal process in general. Inconsistency or inconsistency between these three regulations can create confusion in the legal process related to the return of corruption proceeds. Legal certainty is an important principle in the legal system that demands consistency and clarity in the applicable regulations. Therefore, there needs to be an effort to formulate more consistent and comprehensive regulations regarding the return of corruption proceeds to ensure better legal certainty. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal inconsistency of the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds from the perspective of legal certainty and to analyze the legal consequences of the inconsistency of the regulation of the return of corruption proceeds from the perspective of legal certainty. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Inconsistency of the Law on the Return of Corruption Proceeds from the Perspective of Legal Certainty is that the Indonesian legal system is weak in guaranteeing legal certainty. Multi-interpretable legal provisions, the absence of standard asset return mechanisms, and inconsistent judicial practices create confusion in implementation.
Co-Authors Bagio Kadaryanto, Bagio Winstar, Yelia Nathassa