Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penatalaksanaan Pasien Penyakit Jantung Koroner Di RSPAL dr. Ramelan Surabaya ZULVINA, NADIFA FAULIZA; M. FATHUDDIN AL-ISLAMI; NABELLA CHOLIDATUN NIKMAH; NADHIFA NURIZZAH DHIYANISA; NADIFA SALMA SARI; ROOSTANTIA INDRAWATI; INTAN KOMALASARI
Hang Tuah Medical Journal Vol 22 No 2 (2025): Hang Tuah Medical Journal
Publisher : Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htmj.v22i2.503

Abstract

Background: World Health Organization (WHO) data shows that coronary heart disease is the highest mortality and morbidity throughout the world among other heart and vascular diseases, namely around 43%. The pharmacological therapy is evaluated based on the rationality of drug use including the right indication, the right drug, the right patient and the right dose. The aim of evaluating rational drug use is to ensure that patients receive treatment that suits their needs and at an affordable price. The rational use of drugs is important in the success of disease and improving the quality of health. Methode: The method in research uses an observational analytical method with a retrospective cross-sectional approach, with a purposive sampling technique. Data obtained from the patient's medical record status. The population in this study were all outpatients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease in The Polyclinic Cardiology Department at RSPAL dr. Ramelan Surabaya period of January – March 2023. Result : The most patient characteristics based on range of age were in the 56 until 65 years old, namely 113 patients (33.43%). Characteristics of patients based on gender, the highest number of coronary heart medication users were men, 240 patients (71%). Characteristics of patients based on comorbidities (with comorbidities) were mostly with comorbidities, 296 patients (88%). The percentage of rational drugs of use includes the right indication (78.70%), the right drug (82.25%), the right dose (100%), and the right patient (99.11%). Conclusion: The rationale for using coronary heart medication in coronary heart patients in the outpatient installation at RSPAL dr. Ramelan Surabaya is 94.30% rational. Keywords: Coronary Heart Disease, Evaluation of Drug Use, Drug Evaluation, Outpatient.
The Legal Framework of Abortion in Indonesia and Its Human Rights Im-plications Zulvina, Nadifa Fauliza; Sutarno, Sutarno; Pramono, Agung
Law and Economics Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025): October: Law and Economics
Publisher : Institute for Law and Economics Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/laweco.v19i3.239

Abstract

Abortion continues to be one of the most contentious problems globally, encompassing sensitive discussions across legal, ethical, and reproductive health aspects. In Indonesia, the issue is particularly critical due to the conflict between upholding the fetus's right to life and ensuring women's reproductive health rights. Recent regulatory changes illustrate this complexity: what was previously a complete prohibition under the former Criminal Code has transformed into conditional permissibility under Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 on Reproductive Health, and Minister of Health Regulation No. 2 of 2025. These restrictions are transitional, as abortion will be fully regulated under the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) scheduled to be implemented in 2026. This study utilizes a normative juridical methodology, incorporating statutory and conceptual approaches, to analyze three fundamental issues: the legal status of the fetus, women's reproductive health rights, and the legal protection afforded to physicians conducting conditional abortions. The findings indicate that although the fetus is legally acknowledged as possessing a right to life from conception, these rights may be curtailed in situations such as medical emergencies or pregnancies arising from rape. Simultaneously, women's reproductive health rights are unequivocally secured at both national and international levels. Legal protections for physicians are there; nonetheless, loopholes and ambiguities permit opposing interpretations, so compromising legal certainty.