Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Busroni, Rania Syifa
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Pemohon Dalam Proses Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Sapanah, Mawar; Mufidah, Putri; Faridah, Shafa Fauziyyah Nur; Busroni, Rania Syifa
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia was established as an institution tasked with upholding the supremacy of the Constitution and protecting the constitutional rights of citizens. One of its primary authorities is the judicial review of legislation against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article examines the procedural mechanisms of the Constitutional Court in safeguarding the constitutional rights of petitioners, and to what extent these procedures ensure the fulfillment of the right to justice. Utilizing a normative legal method, this study reveals that although the procedural law of the Court is designed to uphold the principles of fairness and accessibility, significant challenges remain in ensuring optimal protection for petitioners. While the Court’s decisions are final and binding, granting them strong legal force, their implementation and impact on legislative reform still require robust institutional support.
A Comparative Study of Marriage Agreements Between Cross-National Couples in Indonesia and the Netherlands Rizqareka D, Cinta; Afifa, Erina Nur; Busroni, Rania Syifa; Fazila, Raysha Aulia; Akbar, Muhamad Dafi; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17847469

Abstract

Marriages between Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals create complex legal consequences, particularly regarding the regulation of joint property and the legal status of the parties involved. A prenuptial agreement serves as an essential legal instrument to provide legal certainty and protection for the rights and obligations of both spouses. This study aims to analyze the differences in the regulation of prenuptial agreements for couples with different nationalities between Indonesia and the Netherlands, as well as to examine their implications for the recognition and enforcement of such agreements in both countries. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches, using primary legal materials such as the Indonesian Civil Code and the Dutch Burgerlijk Wetboek, along with secondary materials including legal literature and academic journals. The findings reveal that Indonesia still applies the joint property system as the default rule under Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, whereas the Netherlands, since 2018, has adopted the limited community of property system, which establishes the separation of personal property as the legal foundation. Moreover, the Netherlands grants couples with different nationalities the freedom to choose the applicable law through the choice of law mechanism as regulated in Council Regulation (EU) No. 2016/1103, while Indonesia does not yet have a clear mechanism in this regard. These differences have implications for legal certainty, regulatory flexibility, and the protection of spousal rights in mixed marriages
Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Tanah Antara Penjual dan Pembeli (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3459/K/Pdt/2020) Rizqareka D, Cinta; Afifa, Erina Nur; Busroni, Rania Syifa; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17837783

Abstract

Settlement of land sale and purchase disputes between sellers and buyers with a focus on Supreme Court Decision Number 3459/K/Pdt/2020. The dispute arose due to the seller’s breach of contract by refusing to hand over the land object despite the buyer having fully paid the purchase price and completing all procedures for the transfer of rights, including the execution of the PPJB, Power of Attorney, Vacant Possession Deed, and the Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB) before an authorized PPAT. This study aims to analyze the mechanisms for resolving land sale and purchase disputes and to examine the judicial considerations in Supreme Court Decision Number 3459/K/Pdt/2020. The research employs a normative juridical method through an examination of legislation, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The analysis shows that all levels of the judiciary—the District Court, the High Court, and the Supreme Court—found the sale and purchase relationship to be valid and the seller to have committed a breach of contract. The Supreme Court rejected the cassation petition because no error in the application of law was found, while reaffirming the evidentiary strength of authentic deeds and the importance of legal certainty in land transactions. This decision reinforces legal protection for good-faith buyers and provides an important reference for ensuring that land sale and purchase practices proceed in an orderly, lawful manner and prevent future disputes between the parties.
Co-Authors Afifa, Erina Nur Akbar, Muhamad Dafi Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Faridah, Shafa Fauziyyah Nur Fazila, Raysha Aulia Mufidah, Putri Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Rizqareka D, Cinta Sapanah, Mawar