Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak Jurnal Riset Agama
Heryana, Esya
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Interpretasi Ayat-ayat tentang Jilbab: Studi Perbandingan terhadap Musṭafa al-Marāgî dan Hamka Lutfiah, Winona; Heryana, Esya; Fitriani, Fitriani; Raihan, Raihan; Sangaji, Ruslan
Jurnal Riset Agama Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): December
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jra.v1i3.15114

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the interpretation of the verses about the hijab, especially QS. al-Ahzab [33]: 59 and QS. an-Nūr [24]: 31 by comparing two interpretations, namely Musṭafa al-Marāgî in Tafsir al-Marāg and Hamka in Tafsir al-Azhar. The approach used is a qualitative approach through literature study by applying a descriptive analytical explanation system with a comparative interpretation method (muqāran). The results of this study indicate that there are differences in interpretation between Musṭafa al-Marāgî and Hamka regarding QS. al-Ahzab [33]: 59 and QS. an-Nūr [24]: 31, although both agree that the aurat is a part of the body that must be covered, however, they differ in giving the meaning of the veil, as well as in extending the veil. This research recommends to academics to develop it further. It is also expected to be additional information on the interpretations of scholars who are not contemporary, not as traditional and cultural, so that they are able to see a much more colorful variety of interpretations.
Proses Penciptaan Manusia Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Kontekstualitasnya dengan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sains: Kajian Kesehatan Reproduksi Fitriani, Fitriani; Heryana, Esya; Raihan, Raihan; Lutfiah, Winona; Darmalaksana, Wahyudin
Jurnal Riset Agama Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): December
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jra.v1i3.15120

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the contextuality between the Qur'an and science about the process of human creation. This study uses a qualitative method through a literature study, using a reproductive health theory approach and maudhu'i interpretation. The results and discussion of this study indicate that the process of human creation after Adam was through reproduction, among the phases are nuftah, 'alaqah, mudghah, bone formation, muscle formation, then perfected by blowing the spirit, until it becomes the best form. Meanwhile, in science, according to Sadler, the phases are gametogonesis, the process of ovulation to implantation, then the bilaminar gem disc, the embryonic period, to the time of delivery. According to Dudek, they are preferilization, weekly period, embryonic period, and organogenesis. This study concludes that the process of human creation in the Qur'an is in accordance with the findings of modern scientists today. This study recommends that the verses of science be revealed using a book of commentaries with a scientific style.
The Terms Mahīdh and `azā in the Interpretation of Menstruation: A Maqāshid al-Shari’ah Analysis of Surah al-Baqarah (2: 222) Heryana, Esya; Sinta Hardiyanti Utami
Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak (PSGA) IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/yinyang.v20i1.13450

Abstract

This study examines the meaning of mahīḍ and `azā in Surah al-Baqarah (2:222) as terms associated with menstruation. It applies a maqāshid analysis to find out the meaning behind i'tizal command and its benefits for both men and women.  These terms have often been used to justify the perpetuation of patriarchal values. The study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, drawing on classical and contemporary exegetical perspectives, including those of Muslim feminists, while also integrating a maqāshid al-sharī‘ah framework to uncover the intended wisdom behind Surah al-Baqarah (2:222). The study reveals that interpreting the term mahidh —as referring separately to time, location, or the menstrual process itself—has allowed space for the understanding of iʿtizāl fī al-mahidh as a general injunction to avoid women during menstruation. However, a more accurate exegetical reading indicates that the verse refers specifically to abstaining from sexual intercourse, understood as avoiding the site of menstruation. This restriction serves both as an expression of respect for women and as a form of regulation over reproductive health. Furthermore, the term `azā, when interpreted solely through a textual or literal lens—as filth, impurity, blood, or something objectionable—has contributed to social and religious exclusion of women during menstruation. In contrast, a contextual reading of `azā reframes it as a unique biological condition that involves physical and psychological distress. Under such circumstances, it is more appropriate to provide women with comfort, dignity, and recognition of their reproductive rights. Consequently, the objectives of Islamic law (maqāshid al-sharī‘ah), particularly the protection of religion (hifz al-dīn), life (hifz al-nafs), and progeny (hifz al-nasl), become more apparent when this verse is approached not solely through textualist readings, but also through contextual and purposive interpretation. A maqāshid-based analysis thus carries important implications for the physical and psychological well-being of women, and shapes the discourse on sexual ethics, gender relations, and spiritual agency of women in both private and public spheres.
The Dialectical Interplay of Ikhtilāf al-Ṣaḥābah (Companions’ Disagreements): The Constructive Role of Diversity in Early Islamic Jurisprudence Utami, Sinta Hardiyanti; Heryana, Esya; Fajriyah, Mutiara
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.55188

Abstract

This study examines the factors underlying juridical disagreements among the Prophet’s Companions, aiming to challenge the perception that such differences were inherently divisive and instead highlighting their constructive role in the development of Islamic jurisprudence. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach based on library research, the study analyzes classical and modern sources to identify both internal factors, such as variations in linguistic interpretation, reasoning methods, and levels of knowledge, and external factors, including geographical, social, and political contexts, that shaped the Companions’ interpretations of the Qur’an and Hadith or guided their ijtihad when explicit scriptural evidence was absent. Case studies such as the ruling on triple divorce, the punishment for drinking khamr, and the timing of the ‘Asr prayer at Banu Qurayzah demonstrate the diversity of legal opinions that emerged in early Islam. The originality of this research lies in its emphasis on the dialectical interplay between internal and external dynamics, moving beyond simplistic views of disagreement as conflict. The findings imply that the Companions’ differences should be understood as intellectual diversity and tolerance within the classical fiqh tradition, offering valuable insights for contemporary discussions on Islamic legal thought.
Co-Authors Fajriyah, Mutiara Fitriani Fitriani Raihan Raihan, Raihan Sangaji, Ruslan Sinta Hardiyanti Utami Utami, Sinta Hardiyanti Wahyudin Darmalaksana Winona Lutfiah