Ginting, Valencia Laurence
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

A Feminist Stylistic Analysis of Linguistic Resistance in Gloria Gaynor’s "I Will Survive" Br. Sitorus, Rosalyn Magdalena; Ginting, Valencia Laurence; Fitriana, Fadila; Alfian, Alvin; Rangkuti, Rahmadsyah
Journal of English Language and Education Vol 10, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jele.v10i3.809

Abstract

Music is an art form that mirrors social and cultural realities. Gloria Gaynor's iconic song "I Will Survive" is recognized as a symbol of female empowerment. This study aims to investigate how linguistic features in the song portray women's strength and resistance against patriarchal norms, using Sara Mills' feminist stylistics framework. Employing qualitative textual analysis, the study focuses on identifying specific linguistic elements—such as powerful verbs, assertive pronouns, and repetition—that contribute to constructing a narrative of female independence. The findings reveal that "I Will Survive" functions as a textual act of resistance, reshaping the portrayal of women in popular media. This study contributes to feminist discourse by demonstrating how language choices in popular music challenge gender stereotypes and promote ideological empowerment.
MEDIA, DISINFORMATION, AND PUBLIC DECODING: AN ONLINE RECEPTION STUDY OF POLITICAL DISCOURSES Sitorus, Rosalyn Magdalena br.; Nabila, Kanaya Nur; Fitriana, Fadila; Meisya, Shalsa Billa; Ginting, Valencia Laurence; Putri, S.S., M.Si., Dian Marisha
KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, dan Sastra) Vol 9 No 2 (2025): KLAUSA Vol 9 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Ma Chung Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33479/klausa.v9i2.1332

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the political meaning influenced by the media and disinformation interpreted by Indonesian netizens in the online space, especially the connection with the influence of digital literacy, trust in institutions, and political discord. This study employs a qualitative reception analysis based on the Encoding/Decoding paradigm developed by Stuart Hall in 1980, which produced three reading positions: Dominant-hegemonic, Negotiated, and Oppositional. In addition, Critical discourse analysis (CDA) and digital ethnography also form the theoretical basis of this study. The data was collected from four main social media platforms in Indonesia, namely X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, TikTok, and Threads. The results show that Oppositional reading is the most common type of reading position (40%), followed by Dominant-hegemonic reading (35%) and Negotiated reading (25%). In general, the results show that Indonesian netizens display various decoding methods influenced by many backgrounds. Furthermore, it was also found that social media not only functions as a democratic space but also a space for the spread of disinformation. This study provides valuable insight into the political meanings influenced by the media and disinformation as interpreted by Indonesian netizens in the online space. Furthermore, this study contributes to understanding the relationship between political views and individual backgrounds.
Politeness and Solidarity inOnline Apologies: A Sociolinguistic Comparison of Indonesian and American Political Leaders (2019-2025) Ginting, Valencia Laurence; Sitorus, Rosalyn Magdalena; Fitriana, Fadila; Rangkuti, Rahmadsyah
Journal of English Language and Education Vol 10, No 6 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jele.v10i6.1790

Abstract

National leaders' political apologies are essential for rebuilding public confidence, mending diplomatic relationships, and rewriting history. However, rigorous assessments of apologies made particularly by political leaders are still few, and the majority of extant literature concentrates on apologetic tactics in broad communication settings—such as interpersonal contacts, media discourse, or institutional pronouncements. Furthermore, there is a significant vacuum in the research since few studies examine how linguistic framing affects the perceived sincerity, responsibility, and political effect of these apologies across various national settings. By analyzing how political leaders create apologies through word selections, framing techniques, and rhetorical appeals, this study fills up these gaps. The study examines apology writings by various political personalities in response to historical injustices and national crises using a qualitative discourse-analytic method. The results highlight the intricate role of language in negotiating accountability during times of public scrutiny by showing how political apologies strategically combine responsibility-taking, emotional alignment, and future-oriented commitments to shape public perception and minimize political risk.