Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah MITSU (Media Informasi Teknik Sipil Universitas Wiraraja)
Dharma, I Made Sotya Wira
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Engineering Environmental Science Transportation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Perilaku Akibat Pembebanan Pada Konstruksi Sistem Rangka dan Konstruksi Sistem Ganda Dharma, I Made Sotya Wira; Sinarta, I Nengah; Aryastana, Putu
Jurnal Ilmiah MITSU (Media Informasi Teknik Sipil Universitas Wiraraja) Vol 13 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah MITSU
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Wiraraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/ft.v13i1.3571

Abstract

As the height of a building structure increases, the building becomes more vulnerable to responding to lateral loads, which is why a dual-system approach is used to resist the lateral forces that occur in the structure. The use of moment-resisting frame systems (MRF) and dual systems differs particularly in terms of earthquake loads. Based on these conditions, an analysis was performed to compare the effects of loading on a frame system versus a dual system in the structural design of the RSU BaliMed Negara building. In the modeling process, two models were created: Structure 1 represents the existing condition, and Structure 2 incorporates the addition of shear walls. The analysis results show that the 100% mass participation value for Structure 1 is achieved at mode 34, whereas for Structure 2, it decreases to mode 15. The natural period of vibration is also influenced by the structural loading, with the addition of shear walls resulting in a shorter natural vibration period for Structure 2 compared to Structure 1. The base shear forces for Structure 1 are Vd in the X and Y directions at 4,856.70 and 4,856.41, respectively, and Vs in the X and Y directions at 4,635.12. For Structure 2, the values are Vd in the X and Y directions at 4,745.47 and 5,745.43, and Vs in the X and Y directions at 5,508.07. The displacement values for Structures 1 and 2 indicate that the displacement in Structure 2 is smaller.
Co-Authors I Nengah Sinarta Putu Aryastana