Leta Lestari
Department Of Mining Engineering, Faculty Of Mining And Petroleum Engineering, Bandung Institute Of Technology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mine void identification using Object-based Image Analysis (OBIA) of satellite imagery Sentinel 2 data Leta Lestari; Ginting Jalu Kusuma; Abie Badhurahman; Sendy Dwiki; Rudy Sayoga Gautama
Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management Vol 10, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15243/jdmlm.2023.102.4129

Abstract

Open pit mining is an extensively-used method in Indonesian coal mining. This method is characterized by the formation of mine void at the end of life-of-mine (LOM) due to insufficient material to backfill the mine-out areas. Mine voids are legally accepted as one of mine closure options and categorized as “Reklamasi Bentuk Lain” - a miscellaneous reclamation option (Decree of Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources/KepMen ESDM No.1827, 2018), However, unmanageable voids will exert negative impacts. The identification and mapping of mine voids spatially are imperative to give stakeholders ample information to construct viable mine voids management and benefit all stakeholders. In this research, Sentinel 2 satellite image data is used for land monitoring so that void can be mapped based on land cover classification. The land cover classification was carried out based on the Object-based Image Analysis (OBIA) method. This method has a good level of accuracy, ranging from 86.1 to 96.4%. Based on the land cover classification, potential voids are analyzed based on their shape, where potential voids have elongation values of 0.2-1.0 and circularity of 0.1-0.8. In addition, potential voids are analyzed based on the location where they are found (referred to as the Mining License Area/WIUP data). In 2018 there were 40 potential voids inside WIUP and 5 potential voids outside WIUP, while in 2020, 62 potential voids inside WIUP and 8 potential voids outside WIUP were identified in the study area. The final result of potential mine void, i.e. mine void-1 could not further be distinguished between mine sumps, voids, or mine ponds without additional data and analysis. On the other hand, mine void-2 could not be further assigned as natural water bodies or mine void from illegal activities. Subsequent studies using more elaborated data, processes, and analysis are important, to enhance the accuracy of void mapping using satellite images.
Analisis Balik Kestabilan Lereng Highwall di Pit Pandu PT. Putra Muba Coal Kabupaten Musi Banyuasin Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Andy Yanottama; Muhammad Faisal Seprizal; Jarot Wiratama; Zella Navtalia; Leta Lestari
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU TEKNIK Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Agustus : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Teknik
Publisher : Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurritek.v4i2.5849

Abstract

Putra Muba Coal is one of the subsidiaries under the MNC Group, operating in the coal mining sector with an IUP (Mining Business Permit) area covering 2,947 hectares. During its mining operations at the Pandu Pit, PT. Putra Muba Coal experienced a landslide incident on the highwall side. Therefore, a back-analysis using the deterministic method was conducted to determine the material property values that led to the slope failure in the mining area. The slope material consists of claystone and siltstone layers, each with a cohesion value of 192.3 kN/m² and 157.0 kN/m², and internal friction angles of 25.3° and 24.4°, respectively. Based on the back-analysis results, it was found that there was a decrease in material property values, with cohesion reduced by 91% and the internal friction angle reduced by 29%. This reduction in material properties suggests that the decrease in cohesion was the primary factor causing the highwall slope failure, as indicated by the back-analysis of slope stability which resulted in a safety factor of (SF = 1.008).