Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Somatic Auditory Visualization Intelectually (SAVI) terhadap Keterampilan Sosial dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Kelas X Erniati, Nining; Royani, Ida; Imran, Ali
Panthera : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains dan Terapan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): July
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian Kamandanu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (474.631 KB) | DOI: 10.36312/pjipst.v2i3.103

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the Somatic Auditory Visualization Intellectually (SAVI) learning model on social skills and cognitive learning outcomes of students of class X MA NW Sanggeng in the 2016/2017 academic year. The type of research used is quasi-experimental (quasi-experimental). The research design used was pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class X MA NW Sanggeng in the 2016/2017 academic year as many as 33 people consisting of 2 classes, namely class X-A consisting of 16 students and class X-B consisting of 17 students. The sample of this study was taken with a saturated sample technique. Class X-A as the experimental class and class X-B as the control class. The instruments used in this study were lesson plans implementation sheets, student social skills observation sheets and student learning outcomes tests (objective or multiple choice tests). The data analysis technique used to analyze the data from this study was polled variance tests. The results of data analysis showed that there were differences in the improvement of cognitive learning outcomes between students who used the somatic auditory visualization intellectually (SAVI) learning model and students who did not use the somatic auditory visualization intellectual (SAVI) learning model. Social skills in the experimental class with an average value of 75% (active) and in the control class with an average value of 66.22% (active). The results of the t-test are known that the value of ????count is 5.237 which is consulted with at the 5% significance level of 1.696 so that ????count > ttable H0 is rejected (Ha is accepted). This means that there is an effect of using the somatic auditory visualization intellectually (SAVI) learning model on social skills and cognitive learning outcomes of class X MA NW Sanggeng students.
The Effect on the Integrated Chunking Techniques Combined with Writing is Thinking on Students Thinking Levels in the Topic of the Human Circulatory Sirniawan; Mu'min Z, Nurul; Salmiati; Erniati, Nining
BIO-EDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): BIO-EDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi - April 2026
Publisher : Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Timor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32938/jbe.v11i1.10314

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the thinking levels of students learning about the circulatory system taught using the chunking technique combined with writing is thinking, the chunking technique, and the lecture technique in grade XI students at SMA Negeri 20 Gowa in the 2024/2025 academic year. This study was an experiment using purposive sampling with specific considerations. The research population consists of 300 individuals, with 90 samples divided into 6 learning groups. Data collection was conducted using a test instrument consisting of two types of questions: multiple-choice and essay-style, to assess students' thinking levels. Hypothesis testing was performed using an ANOVA test, as the data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The results of the hypothesis testing indicated that the significance level was <0.000. This indicates that the sig value is < α (0.05), so it can be concluded that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. This means that there is a difference in the level of thinking of students taught using the chunking technique combined with writing is thinking (experimental class), the chunking technique (positive control class), and the lecture technique (negative control class) in students learning about the human circulatory system. Since there is a difference, an LSD (Least Significant Difference) test was conducted, showing that the level of thinking among students taught using the chunking technique combined with writing was thinking was the highest, followed by the chunking technique and the lecture technique.