Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Muhammidah, Annisa
Unknown Affiliation
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN SISWA MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA BERBASIS HOTS (HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS) PADA MATERI PEMBAGIAN DI KELAS IV DI SDN 104218 SIDOMULYO Muhammidah, Annisa; Sutarini, Sutarini
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 02 (2025): Volume 10, Nomor 02 Juni 2025 publish
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i02.27683

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine students' ability to solve HOTS-based mathematics problems on the division material in grade IV at SDN 104218 Sidomulyo, to identify students' responses to the given instrument, as well as to examine the validity, reliability, and discriminatory power of the HOTS-based mathematics problem instrument on the division material in grade IV at SDN 104218 Sidomulyo, consisting of 10 questions. This research was a quantitative study using a descriptive method. The population in this research consisted of 43 students, while the sample included 24 students. The research instrument comprised 10 HOTS-based mathematics problems on the division material for grade IV and 20 questionnaire statements on student responses. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software. The results of this research showed that students' abilities were classified as Very High for 2 students (8.3%), High for 3 students (12.5%), Moderate for 11 students (45.8%), Low for 3 students (12.5%), and Very Low for 5 students (20.8%). Students' absorption rate was 60.7%. The majority of the sample gave a positive response to the problem instrument. Out of the 10 instrument items, all were deemed valid and reliable, with 3 questions having good discriminatory power and 7 questions having very good discriminatory power.
Co-Authors Sutarini, Sutarini