Tunjung Sekartaji, Raden Rara Hapsari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE UTILIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT ADDRESSING IUU FISHING FOR SUSTAINABLE GOVERNANCE IN THE FISHERIES SECTOR Tunjung Sekartaji, Raden Rara Hapsari; Ivanly, Ivanly
Hukum Responsif Vol 16 No 1 (2025): Vol 16 No 1 February 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/responsif.v16i1.9913

Abstract

The role of technology in supporting sustainable fisheries governance in Indonesia, particularly in addressing the issues of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing, is crucial. This study emphasizes the main technological aspects: Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and the usage of big data. It will indicate how integrating these technologies can strengthen law enforcement and support the sustainability of the fishery sector. VMS enables authorities to monitor the movement of ships in real time, enhancing the detection of illegal fishing activities. Meanwhile, big data analysis plays a significant role in identifying patterns and trends of IUU fishing through processing data related to ships, catches, and fish movements. Additionally, using the internet for socializing sanctions and regulations to the public raises awareness about the impacts of IUU fishing and the legal consequences faced. This study demonstrates that collaboration between technology and public policy can be the key to more effective and sustainable fisheries law enforcement efforts.
Juvenile Sentencing Policy in Cases of Unauthorized Possession of Sharp Weapons: A Study of North Jakarta District Court Judgment 2024–2025 Ivanly, Ivanly; Tunjung Sekartaji, Raden Rara Hapsari
UNISKA LAW REVIEW Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Uniska Law Review
Publisher : Kadiri Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/ulr.v6i2.9048

Abstract

This research is motivated by the complexity of handling cases of unauthorized possession of sharp weapons by juveniles in conflict with the law. The normative conflict between the repressive Emergency Law No. 12 of 1951 and the restorative Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law has led to inconsistencies in court judgment and legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the current sentencing policy in addressing such criminal acts. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and case approach (analysis of North Jakarta District Court judgment 2024–2025), as well as qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show disparities in case rulings and weak standard guidelines for imposing sanctions: some juveniles were sentenced to social institution rehabilitation or vocational training, while others were simply returned to their parents. This disparity creates legal uncertainty for juveniles as offenders, since similar cases are treated differently without clear criteria. In conclusion, the current sentencing policy has not consistently applied the principles of restorative justice and ultimum remedium, thus harmonization of legislation and clear guidelines are needed to ensure legal protection for children.