Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Law

Peranan Aparat Penegak Hukum dan Lembaga Sosial dalam Penanganan Kasus KDRT di Pademangan Barat Hendrawarman, Hendrawarman; Hidayat , Hendrik; Sari , Ratna; Munthe , Josua Epernando; Sopian, Mohamad Asep
Postulat Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): POSTULAT: Journal of Law
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i2.2036

Abstract

Handling cases of Domestic Violence (DV) in Pademangan Barat is a complex challenge that requires synergistic collaboration between law enforcement officials and social institutions. Although established as a criminal offense through Law No. 23 of 2004, DV often goes unreported as it is considered a private matter or family disgrace, creating an "iceberg phenomenon". This study, conducted through a community service socialization activity in the Pademangan Barat sub-district, examines the roles of these two pillars. The results indicate that law enforcement officials play a fundamental role in the juridical process to provide a deterrent effect and justice , yet its effectiveness still faces challenges such as the "No Viral, No Justice" phenomenon. On the other hand, social institutions play a crucial complementary role focusing on the victim through three essential stages : Preventif, Respresif dan Kuratif.
Evaluasi Penegakan Hukum Anti Monopoli Antara Kepentingan Pasar dengan Kepentingan Publik dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Muta’ali, Abdul Yazid; Hendrawarman, Hendrawarman
Postulat Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1917

Abstract

This article discusses the evaluation of law enforcement in Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning The prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, with a focus on the balance between market interests and public interests. Law enforcement in Indonesia is faced with various challenges, including limited resources, lack of accurate data, and political influence that hinder the effectiveness of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in supervising monopolistic practices. This article analyzes the effectiveness of law enforcement based on the existing regulatory framework and highlights the dilemma faced between promoting market efficiency and consumer protection. The evaluation results show that law enforcement often prioritizes market interests, which can potentially harm the public interest. The obstacles faced, including legal uncertainty and the influence of large business actors, are also identified as obstacles in achieving the desired balance. Therefore, this article suggests the need to increase the capacity of the KPPU, educate the public, and adjust regulations to optimize fair and effective law enforcement. These findings are expected to provide recommendations for improving the supervision system for monopolistic practices in Indonesia.