Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Putra, Bilal Indra
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Differences in Epistemology in Islam: Traditional, Rational, And Sufistic Approaches Putra, Bilal Indra; Husni, Husni; Wahyuni , Sri
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 7 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the diverse epistemological approaches in Islam - traditional (naqli), rational (aqli), and sufistic (dzauqi) - which reflect different methods of acquiring and validating knowledge. The research problem stems from the frequent isolation of these approaches in contemporary discourse, creating a gap in understanding their potential integration and collective contribution to Islamic thought. The objectives are threefold: (1) to analyze the methodological foundations of each approach, (2) to compare their strengths and limitations, and (3) to explore their complementary roles in addressing modern epistemological challenges. Using qualitative methodology with literature analysis, the study draws from classical Islamic texts and works by key figures like Al-Ghazali, Ibn Sina, and Ibn Arabi. The findings reveal that while the naqli approach emphasizes textual authority, aqli prioritizes reason, and dzauqi values spiritual experience, these methods are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they form a dynamic spectrum of knowledge acquisition in Islam. The research demonstrates how integrating these approaches can enrich contemporary Islamic scholarship, particularly in reconciling faith with modern science and addressing secular epistemological frameworks. The implications suggest the need for educational models that harmonize textual, rational, and spiritual dimensions of knowledge, offering Muslims a more holistic approach to navigating today's intellectual landscape while maintaining theological integrity.
Epistemological Differences in Islam: Traditional, Rational, and Sufistic Approaches Putra, Bilal Indra; Husni, Husni; Wahyuni, Sri
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v4i12.943

Abstract

Epistemology in Islam is not singular, but rather a development in various schools of thought that reflects different approaches to sources and methods of acquiring knowledge. This journal examines three main approaches in Islamic epistemology, namely: traditional (naqli), rational (aqli), and sufistic (dzauqi). By examining the various central figures and the arguments they developed, this journal aims to show the dynamics of epistemological thought in the Islamic tradition and the impact it has on the development of science and spirituality of Muslims.
Co-Authors Husni Husni Sri Wahyuni Wahyuni , Sri