Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IDENTIFICATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL LITERACY ACHIEVEMENT FACTORS IN PROVINCE X USING ORDINAL STEPWISE LOGISTIC Azizah, Siti Nur; Gustiara, Dela; Fitrianto, Anwar; Erfiani; Silvianti, Pika
Jurnal Statistika dan Aplikasinya Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Statistika dan Aplikasinya
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/JSA.09103

Abstract

Literacy is a foundational skill that underpins students’ academic success and lifelong opportunities. Low literacy skills can result in long-term disadvantages such as limited access to higher education, low productivity, and social inequality. Indonesia continues to face challenges in improving students' literacy achievement, particularly at the primary school level. According to the PISA 2022 results, Indonesia ranked 69th out of 81 countries, indicating that students’ literacy levels remain relatively low. This study aims to identify the factors that influence the literacy achievement of primary school students in Province X. The analytical method employed is ordinal logistic regression with a backward stepwise approach. The dependent variable is the level of literacy achievement (categorized as low, moderate, and good), while the independent variables include learning quality, teacher reflection and improvement, instructional leadership, school climate (including safety, diversity, and inclusiveness), and curriculum type. The results show that the final selected model follows the partial proportional odds assumption and includes only the significant predictors identified through backward stepwise elimination. Variables that positively influence literacy achievement include safety climate, diversity, inclusiveness, curriculum type, and teachers’ reflection and improvement of learning. Model evaluation using AIC, BIC, and accuracy measures indicates good predictive performance. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers in designing strategies to enhance literacy through strengthening school climate and improving the quality of teaching and learning.
Evaluasi Perbandingan Model XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, dan Artificial Neural Network dalam Klasifikasi Kerawanan Pangan Isnaini, Mardatunnisa; Gustiara, Dela; Muhadi, Rizqi Annafi; Shafa, Shalshabilla; Sartono, Bagus; Firdawanti, Aulia Rizki; Susetyo, Budi; Dito, Gerry Alfa
Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi Volume 14 Issue 1 April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37905/euler.v14i1.36227

Abstract

Food insecurity remains a serious household-level issue, particularly in densely populated regions such as West Java, highlighting the need for analytical approaches capable of accurately identifying vulnerable groups. Machine learning algorithms offer the potential to improve the accuracy and precision of food insecurity classification based on survey data. This study aims to compare the predictive performance and variable importance identification of four machine learning algorithms—Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—in predicting household food insecurity status. The analysis employs SUSENAS 2023 data covering 26,012 households with 14 predictor variables, and food insecurity is classified using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). Class imbalance is addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) within a 10-fold cross-validation framework. The results show that XGBoost achieves the highest accuracy of 71%, while Random Forest provides the best balanced accuracy under the SMOTE scenario. Moreover, all algorithms consistently identify the Wealth Index as the most influential predictor based on their respective Variable Importance measures, followed by variables related to water access and food assistance. Accordingly, XGBoost is recommended in terms of accuracy, whereas Random Forest demonstrates superior balanced accuracy and prediction stability.