Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS SIYASAH DUSTURIYAH TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI BAWASLU KOTA BANDUNG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM Riya Eka Prasetyaningrum; Opik Rozikin
QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, September 2026
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/qanun.v5i1.1428

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana prinsip siyasah dusturiyah diterapkan dalam fungsi pengawasan yang dijalankan oleh Bawaslu Kota Bandung berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris, penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana nilai-nilai keadilan, integritas, dan transparansi yang menjadi inti dalam siyasah dusturiyah mempengaruhi pelaksanaan pengawasan Pemilu. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara dengan anggota Bawaslu serta analisis dokumen peraturan dan kebijakan terkait Pemilu. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa meskipun Bawaslu telah menjalankan peran pengawasan sesuai dengan regulasi yang ada, beberapa tantangan besar masih dihadapi, seperti terbatasnya sumber daya manusia, pengaruh politik lokal, serta kesulitan dalam mempertahankan independensi lembaga. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pengawasan, diperlukan peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat dan program edukasi pemilih yang lebih intensif. Dengan demikian, penerapan prinsip-prinsip siyasah dusturiyah dapat memperkuat kualitas demokrasi dengan memastikan pengawasan yang lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan berkeadilan, serta menjaga integritas Pemilu yang berjalan di Kota Bandung.
Analisis Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pelaku Kelalaian Dalam Berkendara Mengakibatkan Kematian Dalam Putusan Nomor: 313/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Jmr Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Muhammad Irfan Fadil; Yusup Azazy; Opik Rozikin
Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Maqasid Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/mqs.v14i1.26262

Abstract

This study is motivated by the differences in the application of sanctions between positive law and Islamic criminal law for perpetrators of traffic accidents resulting in death due to negligence. The main issue in this study is the discrepancy between the types of sanctions imposed by judges in the positive legal system and those recommended by Islamic criminal law. The purpose of this research is to analyze and compare the forms of accountability applied to perpetrators under both legal systems and to evaluate the implications of justice for both victims and offenders. The method used is normative juridical with a conceptual and case approach. Data were obtained through literature study of court decisions and relevant scholarly works, followed by qualitative analysis of the sanction concepts in both legal systems. The findings indicate that sanctions under positive law tend to emphasize imprisonment, even when the act is committed due to negligence. In contrast, Islamic criminal law classifies such acts as unintentional offenses that are not punishable by imprisonment, but rather require financial compensation to the victim’s family and moral redemption by the offender. This approach is considered to prioritize restorative justice values and the restoration of social relationships. This research recommends the integration of restorative justice principles into the criminal justice system, particularly in cases involving unintentional acts, in order to achieve a more proportional and humane form of justice. Keywords: Accident, Negligence, Islamic Criminal Law, Sanction, Diyat