Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PELANGGARAN TERHADAP HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KORPORASI MENURUT PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Juvelentina Claudia Gabriela Ugu; Delbert C. H. Mongan; Yolanda Salainti
Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026 : Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science
Publisher : PT. Lembaga Penerbit Penelitian Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65244/jggls.v2i1.404

Abstract

Perlindungan hak desain industri bertujuan untuk memajukan industri yang mampu bersaing di tingkat nasional dan internasional melalui penciptaan iklim yang mendorong kreativitas dan inovasi masyarakat sebagai bagian dari sistem Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Perlindungan hukum menjadi penting untuk menjamin terpenuhinya hak pendesain atas karya yang dihasilkannya, mengingat masih banyak terjadi pelanggaran hak desain industri di masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk tindak pidana dan sanksi dalam perlindungan hak desain industri serta pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi atas pelanggaran tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak pidana desain industri meliputi pelanggaran hak eksklusif pendesain, penghapusan nama pendesain, serta pembocoran rahasia permohonan. Pelanggaran tersebut dikenakan sanksi pidana penjara dan/atau denda sesuai UU No. 31 Tahun 2000, serta dapat dipertanggungjawabkan kepada korporasi maupun pengurusnya.
Perlindungan Warga Sipil Dalam Konflik Bersenjata (Studi Kasus Penggunaan Asas Pembedaan Dalam Konflik Di Suriah) Lesza Leonardo Lombok; Angel Christi Singkoh; Yolanda Salainti
INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Pusat Kajian - Universitas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70358/invention.v2i1.1471

Abstract

This study aims to examine the protection of civilians in the armed conflict in Syria through the application of the principle of distinction under International Humanitarian Law. This principle requires conflicting parties to differentiate between combatants and civilians, as well as between military targets and civilian objects. However, in practice, violations frequently occur, resulting in high civilian casualties. The research also aims to analyze the content of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols. The findings indicate that despite the existence of international legal regulations providing protection, violations remain widespread. Therefore, the study recommends strengthening international oversight, enhancing humanitarian law education, and enforcing strict sanctions against violators to improve the protection of civilians
Kebebasan Berpendapat dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia di Era Digital: Jaminan Konstitusional, Pembatasan yang Sah, dan Arah Reformasi Regulasi Indrasatya Octavianus Nasirun; Yolanda Salainti; Hendrasari B. Rawung; Lutfia Harimu; Ridho Pakaya
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Agustus: Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i3.2605

Abstract

Freedom of opinion is an essential constitutional right for democratic accountability, citizen participation, and the exchange of ideas in digital public spaces. This right is guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution and various international human rights instruments that Indonesia has ratified. However, the expansion of social media, disinformation, hate speech, doxing, cyberharassment, and inconsistent law enforcement have made its protections even more complex. Tensions arise between the need to maintain order and protect the dignity of individuals on the one hand, and the state's obligation not to silence legitimate expressions on the other. This article examines the legal position of freedom of opinion in Indonesia, the validity of its restrictions in the digital environment, and the direction of reform after the amendment of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) in 2024 and the latest Constitutional Court ruling. Using normative juridical methods through legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes how positive legal norms are applied in practice and how arrangements in other countries can be referenced. The results of the study show that multi-interpreted articles have the potential to cause excessive criminalization and a chilling effect on freedom of expression. Therefore, this article emphasizes the need to shift from a multi-interpretive and punitive model to a governance based on rights, proportionality, and transparency, so that the protection of freedom of opinion can run in balance with the protection of the rights of other citizens in the digital era.