Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Kedaulatan Negara vis a vis Keistimewaan dan Kekebalan Hukum Organisasi Internasional dalam Sebuah Intervensi Kemanusiaan Lombok, Lesza Leonardo
Pandecta: Research Law Journal Vol 9, No 1 (2014): Pandecta January 2014
Publisher : Semarang State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.2853

Abstract

Perkembangan organisasi internasional yang dimulai dengan pengakuan terhadap variasinya pada sekitaran 1945 dikenal sebagai salah satu perkembangan Hukum Internasional yang membuka aturan baru dunia internasional, dan aspek yang paling sering menjadi perdebatan tentang keberadaannya adalah ketentuan tentang keistimewaan dan kekebalan. Munculnya doktrin Responsibility To Protect, menjadikan fondasi teoritis Hukum Internasional yang telah diterima secara umum selama berabad – abad semakin rapuh. Problem terbesarnya secara jelas adalah pada tataran kedaulatan negara. Organisasi internasional yang melakukan berbagai aktivitas dengan membawa kepentingan negara, semakin memperjelas polemik penerimaan intervensi kemanusiaan dalam sebuah negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan tantangan bagi organisasi internasional dalam sebuah intervensi kemanusiaan tersebut ketika berhadapan dengan Negara-negara tersebut, dan mengemukakan urgensi perlunya keistimewaan dan kekebalan untuk diberikan terhadapnya. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa indikasi pelemahan terhadap kedaulatan, yang direfleksikan misalnya dalam doktrin Responsibility to Protect, tidak akan selalu menambah pertentangan terhadap konsep kedaulatan tradisional yang absolut, namun justru akan memberikan beberapa kemungkinan bagi beberapa negara tertentu untuk memproyeksikan kedaulatan dan kepentingannya secara global. Dengan perumusan kembali konsepsi kedaulatan kepada konsep yang relational atau terbuka, serta semakin besarnya peran organsasi internasional dalam masyarakat internasional baik sebagai treaty makers maupun law makers, maka pemberian keistimewaan dan kekebalan terhadap organisasi internasional semakin penting untuk menjamin pelaksanaan tugas – tugasnya. The development of international organization that began with the recognition of its variations around 1945 was known as one of the development of international law that opens new international rules, and the most often debated aspect is about the provision of privileges and immunities. The emergence of the doctrine of Responsibility To Protect makes the theoretical foundations of international law which has been generally accepted for many centuries become more fragile. The biggest problem is clearly at the level of state sovereignty. International Organizations that developed activities brought by state’s interest, clarify the polemic of the acceptance of a humanitarian intervention. This paper aims to discuss the challenges of international organizations in a humanitarian intervention dealing with these states, and deliver the urgency of a privilege and immunities to them.. By using normative legal research method, this study concluded that the indication of the weakening of the sovereignty, which is reflected for example in the doctrine of the Responsibility To Protect, will not necessarily add to the opposition to the traditional concept of absolute sovereignty, but it will provide possibilities for some countries to project its sovereignty and interests globally. By re-formulate the concept of sovereignty to a relational sovereignty, and the bigger the role of international organizations in the international community as a treaty-makers as well as law-makers, then the privilege and immunities to an international organizations should be applied to assure its functions.
Kedaulatan Negara vis a vis Keistimewaan dan Kekebalan Hukum Organisasi Internasional dalam Sebuah Intervensi Kemanusiaan Lombok, Lesza Leonardo
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 9, No 1 (2014): January
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.2853

Abstract

Perkembangan organisasi internasional yang dimulai dengan pengakuan terhadap variasinya pada sekitaran 1945 dikenal sebagai salah satu perkembangan Hukum Internasional yang membuka aturan baru dunia internasional, dan aspek yang paling sering menjadi perdebatan tentang keberadaannya adalah ketentuan tentang keistimewaan dan kekebalan. Munculnya doktrin Responsibility To Protect, menjadikan fondasi teoritis Hukum Internasional yang telah diterima secara umum selama berabad – abad semakin rapuh. Problem terbesarnya secara jelas adalah pada tataran kedaulatan negara. Organisasi internasional yang melakukan berbagai aktivitas dengan membawa kepentingan negara, semakin memperjelas polemik penerimaan intervensi kemanusiaan dalam sebuah negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan tantangan bagi organisasi internasional dalam sebuah intervensi kemanusiaan tersebut ketika berhadapan dengan Negara-negara tersebut, dan mengemukakan urgensi perlunya keistimewaan dan kekebalan untuk diberikan terhadapnya. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa indikasi pelemahan terhadap kedaulatan, yang direfleksikan misalnya dalam doktrin Responsibility to Protect, tidak akan selalu menambah pertentangan terhadap konsep kedaulatan tradisional yang absolut, namun justru akan memberikan beberapa kemungkinan bagi beberapa negara tertentu untuk memproyeksikan kedaulatan dan kepentingannya secara global. Dengan perumusan kembali konsepsi kedaulatan kepada konsep yang relational atau terbuka, serta semakin besarnya peran organsasi internasional dalam masyarakat internasional baik sebagai treaty makers maupun law makers, maka pemberian keistimewaan dan kekebalan terhadap organisasi internasional semakin penting untuk menjamin pelaksanaan tugas – tugasnya. The development of international organization that began with the recognition of its variations around 1945 was known as one of the development of international law that opens new international rules, and the most often debated aspect is about the provision of privileges and immunities. The emergence of the doctrine of Responsibility To Protect makes the theoretical foundations of international law which has been generally accepted for many centuries become more fragile. The biggest problem is clearly at the level of state sovereignty. International Organizations that developed activities brought by state’s interest, clarify the polemic of the acceptance of a humanitarian intervention. This paper aims to discuss the challenges of international organizations in a humanitarian intervention dealing with these states, and deliver the urgency of a privilege and immunities to them.. By using normative legal research method, this study concluded that the indication of the weakening of the sovereignty, which is reflected for example in the doctrine of the Responsibility To Protect, will not necessarily add to the opposition to the traditional concept of absolute sovereignty, but it will provide possibilities for some countries to project its sovereignty and interests globally. By re-formulate the concept of sovereignty to a relational sovereignty, and the bigger the role of international organizations in the international community as a treaty-makers as well as law-makers, then the privilege and immunities to an international organizations should be applied to assure its functions.
PENDIDIKAN TENTANG SISTEM EKONOMI KERAKYATAN DALAM HUKUM ADAT MINAHASA DENGAN METODE VALUE CLARIFICATION TECHNIQUE SEBAGAI METODE PENCAPAIAN EFEKTIFNYA Lombok, Lesza Leonardo
Forum Ilmu Sosial Vol 41, No 1 (2014): June 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/fis.v41i1.5376

Abstract

Minahasa is one of the tribes in Indonesia, located in the province of North Sulawesi with an agricultural background are very diverse with indigenous culture, especially in the customs of the farm. By having a large area and is rich in natural resources, the Minahasa tribe is famous for its variety of crops are abundant and quality. Although the nation's economic crisis hit Indonesia, Minahasans remained as one of the tribes rich, even becomingone of the backbone of the nation in overcoming the economic crisis have tribesm economic, value clarification technique resulted in the outcome - his produce. This is supported by the local communities in the Minahasa area of democratic economic system in building their economy by leveraging existing resources, called Mapalus. Value - the value that exists in this Mapalus systems qualify to be the one teaching to the world of education today. Methods Value Clarification Technique (VCT) is one of the appropriate methods to assist in the implementation of the system Mapalus teaching to students. Therefore, this study aimed to describe what a democratic economic system used in the customary law of Minahasa, reviewing VCT as an educational method, and examine the implementation of VCT in Mapalus system itself. By using normative research methods - empirical, the authors find that the system is a system Mapalus continuous cooperation of the people, and by using the VCT application in the education system can be done by combining a wide range of expertise, work together in the find and fix a problem, and provision of public confidence in the lower classes in the management of natural resources.
TANTANGAN KEDAULATAN NEGARA DALAM REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT MENURUT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Lesza Leonardo Lombok
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Saraswati
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/jhshs.v4i1.4673

Abstract

Kedaulatan negara merupakan konsep dasar hukum internasional yang bersifat absolut, indivisible, dan inalienable. Segala bentuk kerjasama internasional hendaknya menerapkan konsep dasar kedaulatan negara tersebut. Namun di sisi lain, perjanjian internasional dalam bingkai Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) sebagai salah satu Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA) seolah mengesampingkan hal tersebut. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) hingga kini merupakan kesepakatan perdagangan bebas yang terbesar di dunia. Dengan disepakatinya RCEP maka setiap negara yang mengikatkan diri dalam kesepakatan ini wajib memasukkan RCEP sebagai bagian dari hukum nasionalnya masing – masing. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelaah secara yuridis tentang isi RCEP dan penerapannya bagi Indonesia khususnya kebijakan hukum yang dapat diambil terkait pelaksanaannya di masa yang akan datang. Selain itu penelitian ini mengkaji langkah dan strategi apa saja yang dapat dilakukan oleh Indonesia untuk menggapai peluang dan menghadapi tantangan akibat penerapan RCEP ini.
Settlement of Brand Rights Disputes Through the Commercial Court in Indonesia: Study of Surabaya Court Decision I Gede Mahatma Yogiswara; Lesza Leonardo Lombok; Asrul Ibrahim Nur; I Gusti Bagus Indra Kumara; Ni Nyoman Sri Purnama Sutianti
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): November, 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.23754

Abstract

Brands play a significant role in economic development because they help consumers identify the origin of a product or service. Brand ownership is acknowledged at the time of brand registration with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property. The first prerequisite for registering a brand is ensuring that it possesses all of its attributes. Therefore, some characteristics distinguish it from other brands. Despite these regulations, brand infringements still occur. One of them is the disagreement between PT. Gudang Garan and PT. Gudang Baru, whose brands are comparable. Therefore, a study on Indonesian law enforcement in resolving brand issues is required. The current study employed normative legal research and normative juridical methodologies. Using descriptive qualitative data analysis, the study focused on laws and regulations. The Surabaya Commercial Court determined, based on a dispute between PT. Gudang Garan and PT Gudang Baru, that PT. Gudang Baru breached Article 21 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 20 of 2016, declaring the Gudang Baru brand comparable to the well-known Gudang Garan brand. As a result, the Gudang Baru brand was revoked, and to ensure a deterrent effect, DGKI ordered any application for registration of a brand that resembles PT. Gudang Garan be denied.
Kedaulatan Negara vis a vis Keistimewaan dan Kekebalan Hukum Organisasi Internasional dalam Sebuah Intervensi Kemanusiaan Lesza Leonardo Lombok
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 9, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.2853

Abstract

Perkembangan organisasi internasional yang dimulai dengan pengakuan terhadap variasinya pada sekitaran 1945 dikenal sebagai salah satu perkembangan Hukum Internasional yang membuka aturan baru dunia internasional, dan aspek yang paling sering menjadi perdebatan tentang keberadaannya adalah ketentuan tentang keistimewaan dan kekebalan. Munculnya doktrin Responsibility To Protect, menjadikan fondasi teoritis Hukum Internasional yang telah diterima secara umum selama berabad – abad semakin rapuh. Problem terbesarnya secara jelas adalah pada tataran kedaulatan negara. Organisasi internasional yang melakukan berbagai aktivitas dengan membawa kepentingan negara, semakin memperjelas polemik penerimaan intervensi kemanusiaan dalam sebuah negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan tantangan bagi organisasi internasional dalam sebuah intervensi kemanusiaan tersebut ketika berhadapan dengan Negara-negara tersebut, dan mengemukakan urgensi perlunya keistimewaan dan kekebalan untuk diberikan terhadapnya. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa indikasi pelemahan terhadap kedaulatan, yang direfleksikan misalnya dalam doktrin Responsibility to Protect, tidak akan selalu menambah pertentangan terhadap konsep kedaulatan tradisional yang absolut, namun justru akan memberikan beberapa kemungkinan bagi beberapa negara tertentu untuk memproyeksikan kedaulatan dan kepentingannya secara global. Dengan perumusan kembali konsepsi kedaulatan kepada konsep yang relational atau terbuka, serta semakin besarnya peran organsasi internasional dalam masyarakat internasional baik sebagai treaty makers maupun law makers, maka pemberian keistimewaan dan kekebalan terhadap organisasi internasional semakin penting untuk menjamin pelaksanaan tugas – tugasnya. The development of international organization that began with the recognition of its variations around 1945 was known as one of the development of international law that opens new international rules, and the most often debated aspect is about the provision of privileges and immunities. The emergence of the doctrine of Responsibility To Protect makes the theoretical foundations of international law which has been generally accepted for many centuries become more fragile. The biggest problem is clearly at the level of state sovereignty. International Organizations that developed activities brought by state’s interest, clarify the polemic of the acceptance of a humanitarian intervention. This paper aims to discuss the challenges of international organizations in a humanitarian intervention dealing with these states, and deliver the urgency of a privilege and immunities to them.. By using normative legal research method, this study concluded that the indication of the weakening of the sovereignty, which is reflected for example in the doctrine of the Responsibility To Protect, will not necessarily add to the opposition to the traditional concept of absolute sovereignty, but it will provide possibilities for some countries to project its sovereignty and interests globally. By re-formulate the concept of sovereignty to a relational sovereignty, and the bigger the role of international organizations in the international community as a treaty-makers as well as law-makers, then the privilege and immunities to an international organizations should be applied to assure its functions.
Analisis Hukum Sita Jaminan Dalam Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Robot, Yuddi Handry; Tuwaidan, Arthur; Lombok, Lesza; Melo, Isye
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i6.8331

Abstract

Analisis pada penulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana memahami Sita Jaminan dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mengetahui pengaturan Bagaimana implementasi Pasal 96 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Lembaran Negara 2004 Nomor 6 dan Apa dasar hukum hakim menerima dan menolak peletakan sita jaminan pada perkara perselisihan hubungan industrial. Lewat metode penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif ditemukan kesimpulan Implementasi Pasal 96 Ayat (1) dan (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Lembaran Negara Tahun 2004 Nomor 6 membuka ruang untuk peletakan sita jaminan pada gugatan penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. Selain itu terjadi pertentangan norma ketika majelis hakim hendak memutus suatu perkara perselisihan hubungan industrial yang diletakan sita jaminan dalam hal ini antara penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Lembaran Negara Tahun 2004 Nomor 6 Pasal 96 Ayat (1) dan 3) dengan beberapa yurisprudensi-yurisprudensi perkara perdata dari Mahkamah Agung yang berkaitan dengan penerimaan dan penolakan sita jaminan, sehingga dibutuhkan pengaturan baru maka baiknya ada pengaturan khusus tentang Sita Jaminan pada perkara gugatan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial untuk menegaskan penerimaan dan penolakan sita jaminan dimaksud. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan maka disarankan Mahkamah Agung mengeluarkan/menerbitkan surat Peraturan Mahkamah Agung atau Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung tentang Sita Jaminan pada Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.
PENYELESAIAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL YANG DIGUNAKAN OLEH BURUH/PEKERJA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL Lesza Leonardo Lombok
Jurnal Yusthima Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): YUSTIMA : Jurnal Prodi Magister Hukum FH Unmas Denpasar
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36733/yusthima.v4i02.10537

Abstract

Hubungan Industrial adalah suatu sistem atau jasa yang terdiri dari unsur Pengusaha, pegawai dan unsur pemerintah berdasarkan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, (Pasal 1 Ayat 22 UU Ketenagakerjaan). Penyelenggaraan Hubungan Industrial diatur dalam bentuk ketentuan, baik ketentuan normatif maupun ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada. Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial, suatu keadaan dimana adanya perbedaan pendapat yang mengakibatkan terjadinya benturan kepentingan antara pengusaha dan pekerja karena adanya perselisihan hak, kepentingan, Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja ("PHK") atau perjanjian kerjasama. SBSI (Serikat Buruh Sejahtera Indonesia) adalah salah satu serikat pekerja/buruh yang fokus menuntaskan benturan hubungan industrial yang dialami oleh para anggotanya baik melalui jalur yudisial maupun non hukum.
ANALISIS HUKUM PENGATURAN PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN Yudha Ramadhan Subarja, Purna; Leonardo Lombok, Lesza; Junita Melo, Isye
At-Tanwir Law Review Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universtitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/atlarev.v5i1.4316

Abstract

This study examines the rehabilitation of inmates in correctional institutions as an integral part of the criminal justice system in Indonesia, with a focus on the implementation of Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections. Using a normative legal research method, it was found that the inmate rehabilitation process occurs in stages, starting from observation, rehabilitation within correctional institutions, to social reintegration through assimilation programs and parole. Furthermore, special rehabilitation for inmates convicted of environmental crimes requires a different approach due to the complexity and extensive networks of the offenders. This special rehabilitation aims to increase ecological awareness, change offenders’ mindsets, and equip them with environmentally friendly skills, such as organic farming and waste management. The approach includes aspects of personality development, intellectual growth, self-reliance, as well as ecosystem rehabilitation programs and restorative justice, with strict supervision after release to prevent recidivism. The study’s findings emphasize that the success of inmate rehabilitation depends on the synergy among the government, correctional institutions, society, and families in creating effective and sustainable rehabilitation.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU DI INDONESIA Azhar, Yulham; Junita Melo, Isye; Leonardo Lombok, Lesza
At-Tanwir Law Review Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universtitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/atlarev.v5i1.4305

Abstract

An election with integrity is the foundation of democracy, as stipulated in Article 22E paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, which mandates that elections must be direct, general, free, confidential, honest, and fair (LUBER-JURDIL principles). However, the implementation of elections often faces various challenges, including election-related crimes such as vote-buying, campaigning outside the designated schedule, and administrative violations that threaten the integrity of the democratic process. Using a normative legal research method, the findings show that the Election Law contains approximately 67 articles related to election offenses. However, several of these articles include criminal elements that are difficult to prove factually, such as Articles 492, 494, 495, 513, 515, 518, and 545. The handling of election crimes is carried out through the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu), which involves coordination among the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu), the Police, and the Public Prosecutor’s Office at both national and regional levels. Despite this institutional coordination, the effectiveness of law enforcement remains low due to differing perceptions and working patterns among the institutions involved.