Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal DIskresi
Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo
Faculty of Law, Mataram University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PPU-XVIII/2020 Aditya Pria Setyady; Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo; M. Saleh
Jurnal Diskresi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Diskresi
Publisher : Bagian Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum, Ilmu Sosial, dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/diskresi.v3i1.5009

Abstract

This study aims to find out and understand the existence of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PPU-XVIII/2020, and the legal meaning of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PPU-XVIII/2020 in terms of legal certainty . The research was carried out using normative research methods, using regulatory, conceptualization and case approaches. The research results show that the existence of the Job Creation Law has an impact on the status of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PPU-XVIII/2020 between existence and absence. It is said to exist because it is used as a juridical basis in the Job Creation Law, but substantively the decision of the Job Creation Constitutional Court, especially the constitutional order to substantively improve the Job Creation Law by involving meaningful community participation, is not implemented. The government (in this case the President) actually uses the Job Creation Law instrument which substantively denies the Job Creation Constitutional Court's decision. The legal implications of the Job Creation Law after the Job Creation Constitutional Court's decision have an impact on the law regarding the formation of statutory regulations, because after the Job Creation Constitutional Court's Decision a new concept was accommodated in the form of an omnibus law which had never previously been accommodated by Indonesia. Apart from that, the existence of non-compliance with the Job Creation Law with the Constitutional Decision of the Job Creation Court has the potential to give rise to the phenomenon of constitutional disobedience. Therefore, in the future, it is necessary to formulate the form and type of sanctions for Constitutional Court Decisions and also orientate the Constitutional Court to be able to carry out reviews of laws or laws that conflict with Constitutional Court Decisions. Keywords:Legal Implications: Constitutional Court Decision, Job Creation Law.
Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi dan Rehabilitasi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Rikiandi Sopian Maulana; Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo; Haeruman Jayadi; Rachman Maulana Kafrawi
Jurnal Diskresi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Diskresi
Publisher : Bagian Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum, Ilmu Sosial, dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/diskresi.v3i1.5072

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dasar pertimbangan dan urgensi pembentukan Undang-Undang Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi, dan Rehabilitasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa belum adanya regulasi setingkat undang-undang yang mengatur secara detail mengenai Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi, dan Rehabilitasi. Dengan adanya regulasi Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi, dan Rehabilitasi yang jelas, maka pelaksanaan hak prerogatif Presiden dapat dilaksanakan secara optimal dalam pemberian keadilan kepada masyarakat. Sudah ada arahan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia pada rapat kerja dengan Dewan Perwakilaan Rakyat yang akan segera menyusun perubahan Undang-Undang tentang Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi, dan Rehabilitasi sebagai pelaksanaan dari Pasal 14 ayat (1) dan (2) UUD 1945 agar payung hukum pelaksanaan Grasi, Amnesti, Abolisi, dan Rehabilitasi menjadi lebih jelas dan terang ke depannya. Kata Kunci: Urgensi, Grasi, Abolisi, Kepastian Hukum
Co-Authors Aditya Pria Setyady Haeruman Jayadi M. Saleh Rachman Maulana Kafrawi Rikiandi Sopian Maulana