Saniff, Shereeza Mohamed
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Systematic Literature Review on the Relationship between Sharia Regulatory Framework and Islamic Fatwa Salisu, Auwal; Saniff, Shereeza Mohamed
REVENUE: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Sharia Business Management UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/revenue.v4i1.16027

Abstract

Sharia Regulatory Framework (SRFW) ensures all activities and business transactions by IFIs that are free from non-allowable elements such as Riba (Usury), Gharar (Risks) etc. When such transactions have met the stringent requirements and have fulfilled the Sharia compliance mechanism, only then the transactions by the Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs) are lawful. However, Islamic Fatwa (IF) is not embedded into the current Sharia compliance mechanism. There is needs to be a study to establish the relationship between SRFW and Islamic Fatwa. Yet, there are still not enough studies that conduct a systematic review on this. This study has two objectives. Firstly, to identify the relationship between SRFW and IF. Secondly, to show how Sharia compliance mechanism can be completely established after effective use of IF. The articles were chosen using one leading database, SCOPUS, and one supporting database, Google Scholar, and manual searching. Several important contributions were made by the study to regulators and policymakers. Finally, the findings demonstrate that IFIs could be better regulated in accordance with Sharia principles with effective use of IF through SRFW, the study recommend the specific research areas and content that should focus on future studies.
Religious Moderation in Constantinople in the Resolution of Political Conflicts in the 14th Century Mukaromah, Muhimmatul; Mayasari, Lutfiana Dwi; Saniff, Shereeza Mohamed
AL-TAHRIR Vol 23 No 2 (2023): Islamic Studies
Publisher : IAIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/altahrir.v23i2.6005

Abstract

The Islamic conquest of Constantinople in the 14th century is a captivating historical episode in history that continues to intrigue historians. It stands out due to the involvement of two major world religions - Islam and Christianity. Furthermore, this conquest marked the end of the Roman civilization. One notable aspect of this conquest was the harmonious relationship between Muslims and Christians, which persisted before and after the event. This study aims to explore the implementation of religious moderation in Constantinople to resolve political conflicts. Adopting a historical methodology, the research collects data through extensive documentation and literature studies, employing a socio-political approach. The findings highlight that religious moderation played a crucial role in conflict resolution during the 14th century in Constantinople. The concept of religious moderation was not only applied before the conquest, but also after it. Before the conquest, the value of moderation was demonstrated through peaceful negotiations between the Islamic kingdom and the Catholic prelate in Rome. Several treaties were agreed upon, emphasizing the importance of faith and peaceful dialogue over resorting to military confrontation. Following the conquest, Sultan Muhammad al-Fatih exemplified religious moderation by engaging in negotiations with the inhabitants of Hagia Sophia. They agreed an agreement allowing Christians to continue practicing their faith despite being under Islamic rule. Additionally, al-Fatih displayed respectful treatment towards the prelate and Christian warlords, further exemplifying the value of moderation. The findings of this study shed light on the significance of religious moderation in resolving conflicts and offer a fascinating insight into the history of Constantinople during this period