Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory – 20 As Quality of Life Score Predictor in Patient Using Pessary Arwan, Berriandi; Andi Rinaldi; R.M. Sonny Sasotya; M. Rizkar Arev Sukarsa; Eppy Darmadi Achmad
Andalas Obstetrics And Gynecology Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/aoj.9.2.190-196.2025

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse is one of women’s health major concern associated with decreased quality of life that may cause a disruption in the bladder, gastrointestinal and sexual dysfunction. Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) stated 41% of women aged 50-79 years pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and surgeries performed rate increased from 1.5 to 4.9 cases per 1,000 women per year. Objective: To determine changes in quality of life based on Indonesian version of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory – 20 questionnaire in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Methods: Prospective cohort study carried out in Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung City, Indonesia during the period Januari 2022 – March 2023. The quality of life was followed up three months after hospital discharge. We used the Indonesian version of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory – 20 (PFDI-20). Results: In this study, 20 subjects were involved. The result showed that significant reduction in the quality of life score in patients after the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with conservative treatment such as pessary insertion based on scale Indonesia version of PFDI – 20 questionnaire, with the highest a preoperative PFDI-20 score of 275 and after therapy score reduction until 50. Conclusions: There is a reduction in quality of life scores in patients with pelvic organ prolapse underwent surgery. Further research should be conducted in large number to assess the quality of life of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction in Indonesia using these questionnaire.
Female Sexual Function Index As Sexual Disfunction Predictor On Women Using A Pessary Setyawan Nurtanio; Andi Rinaldi; R.M. Sonny Sasotya; M. Rizkar Arev Sukarsa; Eppy Darmadi Achmad
Andalas Obstetrics And Gynecology Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/aoj.9.2.197-204.2025

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the abnormal descent of pelvic organs that can cause various symptoms, including sexual dysfunction, especially in menopausal women. With increasing life expectancy, the prevalence of POP-related female sexual dysfunction is also rising. Sexual discomfort can result from vaginal wall thinning, stiffness, fatigue, and inability to achieve orgasm, affecting overall well-being and quality of life. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the improvement in female sexual function using the Indonesian version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) one week after pessary insertion in both sexually active (SA) and non-sexually active (NSA) women with POP. Methods: A descriptive before-and-after study was conducted on 20 women aged 50–65 years with POP grades II–IV at Al-Ihsan Hospital, Bandung, between November 2023 and January 2024. All subjects received ring pessary treatment. The FSFI questionnaire was administered before and one week after pessary insertion to assess sexual function. Results: Among 20 participants (mean age: 57 years), 16 (80%) reported sexual dysfunction before pessary insertion. After one week, 14 women (70%) were categorized as not having sexual dysfunction, while 6 (30%) remained in the dysfunction group. Of the 16 women initially affected, 11 (68%) experienced improved sexual function. The ring pessary proved effective without negatively affecting sexual activity. Conclusions: Pessary use in women with POP can improve sexual function without adverse effects on sexual intercourse. However, limitations include the small sample size, short follow-up, and use of only one pessary type. Additionally, multiple unmeasured factors, such as biological, cultural, and social factors, can influence outcomes.