Limbong, Yanecha Margaret
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN OVERCOMING LAKE TOBA POLLUTION DUE TO FLOATING NEEDLE CANES (CASE STUDY IN SILALAHI III VILLAGE SILAHISABUNGAN DISTRICT DAIRI REGENCY) Limbong, Yanecha Margaret; Sihombing, R. Sally Marisa
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, Policy and Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): June 2025, Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, Policy and Politics (IJSSPP)
Publisher : Yayasan Wayan Marwan Pulungan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69745/ijsspp.v3i2.130

Abstract

Floating net cages (KJA) are a container for fish maintenance in the form of a net bag that is located floating on the surface of the water, the large amount of fish feed used every day without waste management, causes the cultivation industry in the waters of Lake Toba to be an environmentally unfriendly fish cultivation industry, The research method in this study is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. Data collection used interview, observation, and documentation techniques. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively with the Collaboration Process theory approach According to Ansell and Gash (2007) Face to Face, Trust Building, Commitment to Process, Share Understanding, Intermediate Outcome. The results of the study show that in the collaboration process carried out by the Environmental Service, Tourism Service, PT Tua Ganda, and the Silalahi community, the owners of floating net cages, namely: Face to face dialogue that has been implemented in the Zero floating net cage program has been running well and has been maximally attempted. Trust building for each activity actor has not been carried out continuously and no trust has been built.  Commitment to process has not been running well, there is no responsibility from the tourism service and the community for the program. Shared understanding has not been running well, information is only in the form of data on the names of the cage owners. Intermediate outcomes were the dismantling of 200 plots, but there has been no follow-up regarding evaluation and monitoring in the field.