Konara, Thamasi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Criminal Law Reform in Education Based on Human Rights: A Comparative Perspective Astuti, Pudji; Konara, Thamasi
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.23739

Abstract

Educational criminal law aims to protect human rights for both teachers and students. This research aims to analyze the reform of criminal law in education by comparing the laws of Indonesia, Finland, and Egypt. This research is a normative legal study with a comparative, conceptual, and legislative approach. The novelty of this research lies in the substance of criminal law regulations in the field of education in Indonesia, which are still general, such as sanctions for teachers who commit molestation against students. The novelty of this research is that in Finland, the critical role of SOOL as a teacher professional organization is being implemented in cases involving teachers and students, and in Egypt, where criminal sanctions related to the abuse of authority in establishing higher education institutions are emphasized. The reform of criminal law in the field of education in Indonesia can be directed towards protecting teachers and involving teacher professional organizations to ensure that teachers cannot be criminally prosecuted for imposing disciplinary sanctions, while also guaranteeing student protection. This research recommends the need for specific regulations on criminal sanctions in the field of education in a separate special or sectoral law as a lex specialis of the New Criminal Code.
A Comparative Analysis of Asset Forfeiture Regulations in Criminal Offenses: The Case of Indonesia, the United Kingdom, and New Zea-land Santosa, Zamroati Tsalisa; Muh. Ali Masnun; Konara, Thamasi
Indonesian Journal of Administrative Law and Local Government Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT (IJALGOV)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijalgov.v1i01.40721

Abstract

Corruption is a type of crime driven by economic motives because it has a negative impact on a country’s economic activities and financial stability. In Indonesia, corruption is an ongoing issue that must be eradicated. This is due to the fact that the financial losses suffered by the state as a result of corruption are enormous. However, the amount of recovered losses is not proportional to the losses themselves. Based on this, efforts are needed to recover state losses, one of which is through asset forfeiture. This study aims to analyze the existing regulation of asset forfeiture related to criminal offenses in Indonesia and to compare the legal frameworks for asset forfeiture between Indonesia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand. This study uses normative legal research methods. The research approach applied includes statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data collection techniques were conducted through literature review, while the analysis technique used is prescriptive qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that the existing regulations on asset forfeiture in Indonesia are governed by various laws and regulations. The asset forfeiture mechanism adopted by Indonesia is in personam asset forfeiture. Meanwhile, the United Kingdom and New Zealand have added in rem asset forfeiture mechanism to their legal systems. In conclusion, Indonesia’s current regulation, which still relies on in personam asset forfeiture, is not yet sufficiently effective in recovering state losses caused by corruption