Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Ulil Albab
Amiratunil Khaira
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep Suami sebagai Pemimpin dalam Pernikahan Al-Quran Surah an-Nisa’ ayat 34 Rosita, Naela; Fatimah Azzahra; Amiratunil Khaira
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 9: Agustus 2025
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jim.v4i9.10973

Abstract

The difference in interpretation of the meaning of qawwam in the Qur'an, Surah An-Nisa' 34, has given rise to many conflicts in the concept of the relationship between men and women in the household. Where according to some figures, qawwam is considered a full right for men as leaders in the household and vice versa, qawwam is considered a conditional right of cause and effect that must be fulfilled in a marriage relationship. The purpose of this study is to find out multidisciplinary according to the views of prominent scholars, scholars of interpretation, hadith and feminists about the meaning of qawwam in the Qur'an, Surah An-Nisa 34. The type of research used in this study is descriptive qualitative with a data collection method based on library research. In this study, it was found that in essence the concept of a husband as a leader/qawwam in marriage is fully related to the fulfillment of a husband's rights and obligations in marriage in accordance with the qodrat determined by Allah.
JUDICIAL REVIEW PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG PENODAAN AGAMA Fatimah Azzahra; Naela Rosita; Amiratunil Khaira
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Oktober : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/dnpy5a78

Abstract

The judicial review of Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 on the Prevention of Religious Abuse and/or Blasphemy has sparked significant legal and constitutional discourse in Indonesia. This law, which was enacted during the Guided Democracy era, has often been criticized for conflicting with post-amendment constitutional norms, particularly those related to human rights and religious freedom. The purpose of this study is to examine, from a multidisciplinary legal perspective, the Constitutional Court's interpretation and reasoning in three major decisions: Case No. 140/PUU-VII/2009, No. 84/PUU-X/2012, and No. 56/PUU-XV/2017. Using a normative juridical approach and descriptive qualitative method through library research, this paper analyzes the arguments presented by the petitioners, the government, and the Court, including dissenting and concurring opinions. The findings of this study indicate that the Court consistently upheld the constitutionality of the blasphemy law, arguing for the importance of public order and religious harmony. However, the rulings also reveal an ongoing tension between majority religious interests and the protection of minority rights. This study concludes that while the law remains valid, its application risks undermining legal certainty, equality before the law, and freedom of religious expression in a pluralistic society.
Co-Authors Fatimah Azzahra Naela Rosita Rosita, Naela