Naela Rosita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

JUDICIAL REVIEW PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG PENODAAN AGAMA Fatimah Azzahra; Naela Rosita; Amiratunil Khaira
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Oktober : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/dnpy5a78

Abstract

The judicial review of Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 on the Prevention of Religious Abuse and/or Blasphemy has sparked significant legal and constitutional discourse in Indonesia. This law, which was enacted during the Guided Democracy era, has often been criticized for conflicting with post-amendment constitutional norms, particularly those related to human rights and religious freedom. The purpose of this study is to examine, from a multidisciplinary legal perspective, the Constitutional Court's interpretation and reasoning in three major decisions: Case No. 140/PUU-VII/2009, No. 84/PUU-X/2012, and No. 56/PUU-XV/2017. Using a normative juridical approach and descriptive qualitative method through library research, this paper analyzes the arguments presented by the petitioners, the government, and the Court, including dissenting and concurring opinions. The findings of this study indicate that the Court consistently upheld the constitutionality of the blasphemy law, arguing for the importance of public order and religious harmony. However, the rulings also reveal an ongoing tension between majority religious interests and the protection of minority rights. This study concludes that while the law remains valid, its application risks undermining legal certainty, equality before the law, and freedom of religious expression in a pluralistic society.
Women’s Use of Social Media Durring the Iddah Period Following Divorce: A Perspektive Based Of Goffman’s Dramaturgy and Wahbah Zuhaili’s Fiqh Nur vita Ristiana; Naela Rosita; Azka Syifaul Maula; Syifa Hanifah; Naufal Faiq Mubarak
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 2 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/vwq0z253

Abstract

The ease of using social media has transformed the patterns of self-expression among its users, including women undergoing the ‘iddah period following divorce. This study aims to analyse women’s social media practices during the ‘iddah period based on Erving Goffman’s dramaturgical theory, and to examine the legal implications from the perspective of Wahbah al-Zuhaili’s contemporary fiqh. This study employs a qualitative approach with a case study focus. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with three female informants currently undergoing the ‘iddah period, as well as through observation of their social media activities. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis with a socio-legal approach. The findings indicate that social media reveals a ‘front stage’ characterised by self-representation through social media posts that provoke negative comments, whilst the ‘back stage’ reveals unseen emotional dimensions, such as posting content driven by a need for public validation or validation from a former husband. This confirms that social media can also function as a space for identity construction that is inseparable from psychological dynamics. From the perspective of Wahbah al-Zuhaili’s fiqh, based on maqashid al-sharia, some of these digital behaviours are inconsistent with the principles of safeguarding honour, religion and social stability during the ‘iddah period. This study concludes that women’s social media practices during the ‘iddah period are influenced by social and emotional factors, as well as developments in digital technology.