Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK)
Samsinah, Linda
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
KETERAMPILAN MENULIS TEKS DESKRIPSI DI KURIKULUM MERDEKA KELAS VIIA SMP NEGERI 5 SUNGAI RAYA Samsinah, Linda; Wartiningsih, Agus; Sanulita, Henny
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK) Vol 14, No 7 (2025): Juli 2025
Publisher : Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/jppk.v14i7.95859

Abstract

This research examines the general problem of discussing and analyzing descriptive texts written by student sin Indonesian language lessons in the Merdeka Curriculum ofanalyzing descriptive texts from the aspects of title, structure and linguistic rules from the work sheets that have been created by students. The research method used was a descriptive method in the form of qualitative research. The source of research data is class VII A students. The data in this research are the results of students' assignments in writing descriptive texts. The data collection techniq ueusedin this researchis document study.Basedon the research results, looking at the title aspect, it was found that 10 people received very good assessment criteria, 10 people received good assessment criteria. Judging from the aspect of the identification structure, 6 people received very good assessment criteria, 11 people received good assessment criteria, 2 people received adequate assessment criteria,1 person received poor assessment criteria. Judging from the structural aspect of the section description, 2 people got a score of 5 with good assessment criteria. 10 people received adequate assessment criteria, 8 people received inadequate assessment criteria. In the conclusion impression structure, 2 people got good assessment criteria, 10 people got adequate assessment criteria. There were 5 students who got a score of 2 with poor assessment criteria. In the aspect of linguistic rules, 2 people received very good assessment criteria, 6 people received good assessment criteria, 7 people received adequate assessment.There were 3 people who received poor assessment criteria.
Co-Authors Agus Wartiningsih Henny Sanulita