Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

COMMOGNITIVE SISWA SMP DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GENDER Eko Yandi Raharjo; Subanji Subanji; Sisworo Sisworo
AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Vol 13, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/ajpm.v13i2.8791

Abstract

Penelitian telah menunjukkan bahwa siswa laki-laki memiliki kemampuan yang lebih baik dalam menerapkan rumus matematika secara tepat dan benar, namun mereka kurang dalam menjelaskan secara rinci langkah-langkah yang diambil dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Sedangkan, siswa perempuan mampu menyelesaikan masalah secara sistematis, namun mereka lupa untuk menuliskan secara jelas penggunaan rumus matematika yang diterapkan, Penting untuk memahami bagaimana perbedaan ini mempengaruhi pencapaian siswa dalam matematika, dengan memahami pendekatan yang berbeda ini, pendidik dapat mengembangkan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih inklusif. Sehingga, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan commognitive siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah ditinjau dari gender. Jenis penelitian ini adalaah deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII SMPN 2 Sampit, Kalimantan Tengah. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 4 siswa dengan masing-masing dua siswa laki-laki dan dua siswa perempuan. Data penelitian diambil dari tes tulis siswa dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Tes tulis digunakan untuk mengetahui commognitive siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan commognitive siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah berdasarkan gender memiliki perbedaan. Siswa laki-laki menyelesaikan masalah dengan menggunakan keempat komponen commognitive yaitu word use, visual mediator, routine, narrative. Sedangkan siswa perempuan menyelesaikan masalah dengan tiga komponen commognitive yaitu word use, visual mediator, dan routine. Research has shown that male students have a better ability to apply mathematical formulas precisely and corectly, but they lack in explaning in detail the steps taken in solving problems. Whereas, female students are able to solve problems systematically, but they forget to write down clearly the use of mathematical formulas applied, it is important to understand how these difference affect students achievement in mathematics, by understanding these different approaches, educators can develop more inclusive learning strategies. Thus, This study aims to describe junior high school students commognitive in solving problems in terms of gender. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The research subjects were VIII grade students of SMPN 2 Sampit, Central Kalimantan. The research subjects were 4 students with two male student and two female student each. The research data were taken from students written tests and inverviews. Data analysis techniques in this study are data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusion. Written tests used to determine students commognitive. The results showed that students commongitive in solving gendered problems had differences. Male studens solve problems using all four commognitive components, namely word use, visual mediator, routine, narrative. While female students solve problems with three commognitive components namely word use, visual mediator, and routine. 
Commognitive terhadap Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Program Linear: Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa S1 Pendidikan Matematika Yandi Raharjo, Eko
Jurnal Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan matematika STKIP PGRI Pacitan STKIP PGRI Pacitan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21137/edumatic.v6i2.1458

Abstract

Commognitive theory views mathematical thinking as a form of communication that reflects an individual’s conceptial structure in understanding mathematics. This study is motivated by the finding that students often have difficulty in constructing mathematical models and interpreting solutions in the context of linear programs. This study aims to describe the thought process of undergraduater mahtematics education students in solving linear program progrlems based on commognitive theory. With a qualitative case study approach, two students were selected through purposive sampling technique and analyzed using problem solving questions, think aloud, and clinical interviews. The data were analyzed based on four commognitive components: word use, visual mediator, narratives, and routines. The results showed that subject M1 was able to construct a logical and coherent mahtematical narrative, although there were still deficiencies in the formula explicitness. In contrast, Subject M2 showed ritualistic mathematical communication, accompanied by logical leaps and incomplete procedures.
Understanding Students’ Proportional Reasoning through Contextual Tasks in RME: A Qualitative Perspective etmy, desventri; amalia putri , prismadian; yandi raharjo, Eko; susanta, agus; yensy astuty, nurul
Journal of Mathematics and Applied Statistics Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Insan Literasi Cendekia (INLIC) Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35914/mathstat.v3i1.312

Abstract

This study aims to describe students’ mathematical reasoning processes within the framework of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME), particularly focusing on how learners develop proportional and logical reasoning through contextual tasks. Using a qualitative case study design, the research involved classroom observations, task-based interviews, and analysis of students’ written work collected from two purposively selected university students. Data were examined through thematic analysis to identify patterns of reasoning related to multiplicative strategies, symbolic manipulation, and the use of contextual or visual representations. The findings indicate that both students demonstrated strong procedural and symbolic proficiency, especially in applying logical laws and performing formal transformations; Student A showed consistent vertical mathematization, while Student B provided partial conceptual explanations but lacked systematic justification. However, neither student exhibited meaningful horizontal mathematization, contextual interpretation, nor the use of emergent models characteristic of RME-based learning. Their reasoning predominantly reflected imitative-procedural approaches rather than creative or relational reasoning, suggesting that their learning experiences did not sufficiently support guided reinvention or conceptual development through realistic contexts. These results highlight the need for instructional designs that integrate contextual tasks, visual models, and scaffolding aligned with RME principles to foster deeper conceptual understanding and more flexible reasoning. Keyword : Proportional Reasoning; Realistic Mathematics Education (RME); Mathematical Reasoning.