Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Discursive and Metalinguistic Perspectives on AI-Generated Writing Feedback: A Student Perception Study T. Muntazar; Ibnu Hajar
Journal Informatic, Education and Management (JIEM) Vol 7 No 2 (2025): AUGUST
Publisher : STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61992/jiem.v7i2.168

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' perceptions of the role of Grammarly and QuillBot as artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools for providing feedback in writing instruction. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the research was conducted at three senior high schools in Lhoksumawe, Indonesia, with 12 purposively selected respondents based on their prior experience using both applications. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews lasting 30 - 45 minutes, analyzed using thematic analysis, and validated through data triangulation and member checking. The findings indicate that the majority of students perceived Grammarly as effective in detecting grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors, with its explanatory features aiding their understanding of error patterns. QuillBot was regarded as superior in paraphrasing, enriching linguistic variation, and reducing plagiarism risks. Both tools accelerated the revision process, enhanced confidence, and improved language accuracy. However, identified challenges included limitations of free features, potential meaning distortions in paraphrasing, cultural-context mismatches, and risks of overreliance. The findings underscore the importance of a "human-in-the-loop" model that integrates AI's speed and consistency with teacher validation and contextual assessment. This blended feedback strategy holds potential for improving writing quality while fostering students' critical thinking and self-evaluation skills. The study recommends AI literacy training, restricted use in final revision stages, and classroom discussions based on AI-generated corrections to promote more reflective and effective writing instruction.
THE EFFICACY OF CHATGPT IN ENHANCING WRITING PROFICIENCY AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS Mawardi; Ibnu Hajar; Jumaida Fajar Nassriati; T. Muntazar; Helmiyadi
International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET) Vol. 4 No. 5 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijset.v4i10.1081

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of ChatGPT as an AI-assisted learning tool to improve undergraduate English department students' academic writing skills at Bumi Persada University in Indonesia. Twelve participants participated in the study, which used a mixed-methods research methodology. Lexical complexity, grammatical precision, and textual coherence are three important aspects of writing proficiency that were quantitatively measured using a pre-test and post-test paradigm. A deeper understanding of the student experience was made possible by qualitative data collected via semi-structured interviews and comprehensive questionnaires. The results show that there were notable benefits to including ChatGPT in the writing process. Notably, students' writing quality significantly improved, they became more motivated and involved in writing assignments, and they became more capable of learning on their own. However, the study also discovered a significant challenge: an overreliance on AI-generated ideas, which may impede the development of autonomous critical thinking and unique composition skills. The study finds that, while ChatGPT is a beneficial additional tool for second language writing pedagogy, its adoption necessitates careful instructional design to reduce the hazards of dependency and maximize the advantages for long-term skill acquisition.