Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Muh Amin Saleh
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Pergeseran Paradigma Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dari Unfair Dismissal ke Efisiensi Perusahaan (Perbandingan Era Ketenagakerjaan dan Era Cipta Kerja) Muh Amin Saleh; Solikhin, Solikhin
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2490

Abstract

This study examines the paradigm shift in termination of employment from unfair dismissal to corporate efficiency by comparing Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation. Two research questions are proposed. First, how changes in the regulation of termination of employment shape this paradigm shift. Second, how the regulation of termination of employment due to efficiency in Law Number 6 of 2023 compares with Law Number 13 of 2003 in terms of worker protection. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results show that the paradigm shift occurs in three dimensions: the basic framework (from ultimum remedium to flexibility), the efficiency position (from limited reasons with high compensation to broad reasons with lower compensation), and the logic of protection (from preventive to repressive, based on immature social security). The regulation of termination of employment due to efficiency in Law Number 6 of 2023 continues to provide protection, but qualitatively decreases due to the loss of objective parameters and the absence of preventive obligations. The proposed strengthening strategies include establishing objective efficiency parameters, strengthening oversight mechanisms, evaluating the Job Loss Guarantee program, and ensuring strict interpretation by the judiciary. This study concludes that without these improvements, the paradigm shift could potentially conflict with the principles of the rule of law and social justice.
Analisis Hukum terhadap Kesenjangan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Kasus Pengalihan Hak Paten Konstruksi Sarang Laba Laba di Indonesia Intan Maharani; Muh Amin Saleh
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2491

Abstract

This study analyzes the gap between legal certainty and justice in patent protection in Indonesia through a case study of the transfer of patent rights for the Spider Nest Construction. The problem formulation includes two things. First, what is the form of distortion of legal certainty in the transfer of patent rights. Second, how is the violation of the inventor's moral and economic rights and the institutional factors that cause it. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that the distortion of legal certainty occurs because the registration of the transfer of rights only uses a Power of Attorney without an authentic deed, which violates Article 11 of the Patent Law. In addition, the unilateral action of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property to freeze and revoke the freezing of patents without a court decision violates Article 132 of the Patent Law. Violation of moral rights is manifested in the form of false attribution in the JALLA patent. Economic rights are ignored through embezzlement of royalties. The peak of injustice is the accusation of plagiarism against the original inventor for his own development invention. Inhibiting factors include institutional weaknesses within the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, excessive judicial intervention, low human resource capacity, regulatory disharmony, and an unsupportive legal culture. Strengthening strategies include institutional reform, revision of the Patent Law, ratification of international conventions, digitalization, international certification, and the establishment of a specialized intellectual property court. In conclusion, without strengthening integrated intellectual property legal policy, the gap between procedural legal certainty and substantive justice will continue to weaken the national innovation ecosystem.
Penerapan Diversi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika terhadap Anak : Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN.Jkt.Brt Ferderic Imanuel Maruao; Muh Amin Saleh; Muhenri Sihotang
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): September: Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i3.6701

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of diversion for a child perpetrator of a narcotics offense in Court Decision Number 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Jkt.Brt, as well as the factors considered by the judge in rendering the verdict. This is a normative legal study of a descriptive-analytical nature, employing statutory, case, conceptual, and historical approaches. The findings indicate that diversion could not be implemented in the case at hand because the penalty prescribed under Article 113 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics exceeds the seven-year maximum limit stipulated in Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System as a prerequisite for diversion; consequently, the child who was actually in an unequal and exploitative power dynamic with an adult perpetrator was processed through the formal judicial system. The study recommends harmonizing the diversion threshold in Law Number 11 of 2012 with the restorative justice threshold in the new Criminal Procedure Code, and highlights the need for affirmative regulations that explicitly acknowledge the status of the child as a victim of criminal exploitation (child criminal exploitation) within organized narcotics offenses.
Co-Authors Ferderic Imanuel Maruao Intan Maharani Muhenri Sihotang Solikhin Solikhin