Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara
Muh Amin Saleh
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Peran Judex Facti dalam Perkara Narkotika (Analisis Putusan Banding Nomor 130/PID.SUS/2023/PT DKI) Muh Amin Saleh; Junet Hariyo Setiawan
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v4i3.5569

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the reconstruction of the judex facti role by the High Court in narcotics cases involving law enforcement officials. Using a normative juridical approach, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of Appellate Court Decision Number 130/PID.SUS/2023/PT DKI in the case of Inspector General Teddy Minahasa Putra. The findings reveal that the High Court failed to carry out its corrective function substantively as a judex facti. The study identifies three fundamental weaknesses: first, factual reconstruction was not supported by scientific verification and in-depth evidence analysis; second, there was non-compliance with electronic evidence standards as stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2020 and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law; third, structural bias was evident in handling this institutional case. This research recommends comprehensive reforms in the electronic evidence system through amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), standardization of digital chain of custody, and strengthening the impartiality of appellate courts. The study makes a significant contribution to the development of criminal procedure law in the digital era, particularly regarding the accountability of the appellate judiciary system.
Analisis Yuridis Pergeseran Paradigma Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dari Unfair Dismissal ke Efisiensi Perusahaan (Perbandingan Era Ketenagakerjaan dan Era Cipta Kerja) Muh Amin Saleh; Solikhin, Solikhin
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2490

Abstract

This study examines the paradigm shift in termination of employment from unfair dismissal to corporate efficiency by comparing Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation. Two research questions are proposed. First, how changes in the regulation of termination of employment shape this paradigm shift. Second, how the regulation of termination of employment due to efficiency in Law Number 6 of 2023 compares with Law Number 13 of 2003 in terms of worker protection. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results show that the paradigm shift occurs in three dimensions: the basic framework (from ultimum remedium to flexibility), the efficiency position (from limited reasons with high compensation to broad reasons with lower compensation), and the logic of protection (from preventive to repressive, based on immature social security). The regulation of termination of employment due to efficiency in Law Number 6 of 2023 continues to provide protection, but qualitatively decreases due to the loss of objective parameters and the absence of preventive obligations. The proposed strengthening strategies include establishing objective efficiency parameters, strengthening oversight mechanisms, evaluating the Job Loss Guarantee program, and ensuring strict interpretation by the judiciary. This study concludes that without these improvements, the paradigm shift could potentially conflict with the principles of the rule of law and social justice.
Analisis Hukum terhadap Kesenjangan Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan dalam Kasus Pengalihan Hak Paten Konstruksi Sarang Laba Laba di Indonesia Intan Maharani; Muh Amin Saleh
Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/birokrasi.v4i1.2491

Abstract

This study analyzes the gap between legal certainty and justice in patent protection in Indonesia through a case study of the transfer of patent rights for the Spider Nest Construction. The problem formulation includes two things. First, what is the form of distortion of legal certainty in the transfer of patent rights. Second, how is the violation of the inventor's moral and economic rights and the institutional factors that cause it. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that the distortion of legal certainty occurs because the registration of the transfer of rights only uses a Power of Attorney without an authentic deed, which violates Article 11 of the Patent Law. In addition, the unilateral action of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property to freeze and revoke the freezing of patents without a court decision violates Article 132 of the Patent Law. Violation of moral rights is manifested in the form of false attribution in the JALLA patent. Economic rights are ignored through embezzlement of royalties. The peak of injustice is the accusation of plagiarism against the original inventor for his own development invention. Inhibiting factors include institutional weaknesses within the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, excessive judicial intervention, low human resource capacity, regulatory disharmony, and an unsupportive legal culture. Strengthening strategies include institutional reform, revision of the Patent Law, ratification of international conventions, digitalization, international certification, and the establishment of a specialized intellectual property court. In conclusion, without strengthening integrated intellectual property legal policy, the gap between procedural legal certainty and substantive justice will continue to weaken the national innovation ecosystem.
Co-Authors Intan Maharani JUNET HARIYO SETIAWAN Solikhin Solikhin