Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education Omega: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Fisika
Widana, Sausan Nada
Unknown Affiliation
Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN KONDUKTIVITAS TERMAL LOGAM BESI DAN KUNINGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE EKSPERIMEN SEDERHANA Falakh, Athfatullaila Elyo; Widana, Sausan Nada; Kusumah, Fuji Hernawati
OMEGA : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SAINS FISIKA Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Omega: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sains Fisika
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Unpacti Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47650/omega.v4i1.2028

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan konduktivitas termal dua jenis logam, yaitu kuningan dan besi melalui eksperimen sederhana berbasis pengukuran suhu. Masing-masing logam memiliki bentuk silinder dengan diameter 0,5 cm dengan panjangnya 29,8 cm. Percobaan dilakukan secara bergantian pada masing-masing logam guna menjaga konsistensi hasil. Salah satu logam dipanaskan menggunakan lilin dan 2 termometer digantungkan pada jarak yang berbeda yaitu 12 cm dan 20 cm dihitung dari ujung logam yang dipanaskan. Hasil menunjukan bahwa kuningan meningkat lebih cepat dibandingkan besi. Hasil percobaan ini menunjukan bahwa kuningan memiliki konduktivitas termal lebih tinggi dibanding besi. Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman dasar mengenai perbedaan kemampuan penghantaran panas antar logam.
Students' Lexical Difficulties in Classical Mechanics and Modern Physics Vocabulary: A Survey Analysis Falakh, Athfatullaila; Widana, Sausan Nada; Sidik, Muhamad Raka Arya; Wahyunengsih, Wahyunengsih
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i4.2384

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The aim of this study is to map undergraduate students’ physics vocabulary needs in classical mechanics and modern physics by identifying their levels of familiarity, frequency of use, and perceived difficulty of scientific terms across different physics domains. Methodology: This study employed a descriptive quantitative survey method. The instrument was a researcher-developed structured questionnaire containing physics vocabulary items, validated by expert review. Data were collected online using Google Forms. Responses were measured with a three-point Likert scale and analyzed descriptively using Microsoft Excel software. Main Findings: The results show that students demonstrate high vocabulary recognition in classical mechanics and energy-related terms. Moderate recognition appears in laboratory and academic vocabulary. Low recognition is found in thermodynamics and modern physics terms, especially abstract and theoretical concepts. Overall vocabulary familiarity decreases as conceptual abstraction increases across physics domains. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces a systematic, domain-based mapping of physics vocabulary by integrating familiarity, frequency of use, and perceived difficulty across multiple physics fields. It advances existing research by providing comparative evidence between classical mechanics and modern physics, offering empirical insights that support targeted vocabulary instruction in higher education physics learning.
Students' Lexical Difficulties in Classical Mechanics and Modern Physics Vocabulary: A Survey Analysis Falakh, Athfatullaila; Widana, Sausan Nada; Sidik, Muhamad Raka Arya; Wahyunengsih, Wahyunengsih
Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/sjpe.v6i4.2384

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The aim of this study is to map undergraduate students’ physics vocabulary needs in classical mechanics and modern physics by identifying their levels of familiarity, frequency of use, and perceived difficulty of scientific terms across different physics domains. Methodology: This study employed a descriptive quantitative survey method. The instrument was a researcher-developed structured questionnaire containing physics vocabulary items, validated by expert review. Data were collected online using Google Forms. Responses were measured with a three-point Likert scale and analyzed descriptively using Microsoft Excel software. Main Findings: The results show that students demonstrate high vocabulary recognition in classical mechanics and energy-related terms. Moderate recognition appears in laboratory and academic vocabulary. Low recognition is found in thermodynamics and modern physics terms, especially abstract and theoretical concepts. Overall vocabulary familiarity decreases as conceptual abstraction increases across physics domains. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study introduces a systematic, domain-based mapping of physics vocabulary by integrating familiarity, frequency of use, and perceived difficulty across multiple physics fields. It advances existing research by providing comparative evidence between classical mechanics and modern physics, offering empirical insights that support targeted vocabulary instruction in higher education physics learning.
Co-Authors Falakh, Athfatullaila Falakh, Athfatullaila Elyo Fuji Hernawati Kusumah Sidik, Muhamad Raka Arya Wahyunengsih, Wahyunengsih