Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pemanfaatan Sisa Embrio Beku Program Bayi Tabung Sebagai Terapi Transplantasi Sel Punca di Indonesia Sari, Jayanti Purnama; Santosa, Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi; Winata, I Gde Sastra
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i1.8286

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the latest phenomenon in the development of sources of embryonic stem cells in the world, as a criticism of the Health Act that closed Indonesia's opportunity to undertake health transformation. Now many countries have begun to legalize embryonic stem cells by exploiting the remains of the in vitro fertilization embryos left just by their owners. It responds to earlier debates about the method of embryonic stem cells that originate in a fetus or embryos taken from a mother's womb. Some research sources say that embryonic stem cells have more potential than non-embryonic. On that basis, it is interesting to study how the Indonesian Health Act responds to these developments and the commitment to transform in terms of health. The innovation in this research focuses on responding to existing research that more categorizes embryonic stem cells as violating the ethics of living beings and strictly prohibits the use of embryonal stem cell. This research method is normative, using statutory and comparative approaches. The results of this research are, first, that embryonic stem cells have greater potential than the adult stem cells currently used and countries around the world are starting to legalize the use of embryonic stem cells by utilizing leftover embryos from in vitro fertilization. Second, Indonesia is still unable to carry out health transformation by utilizing legal instruments, such as the preamble to the Health Law and Development Legal Theory.Tujuan penelitian ini ialah memberikan gambaran fenomena terbaru perihal perkembangan sumber dari sel punca embrionik di dunia, sebagai kritik terhadap Undang-Undang Kesehatan yang menutup rapat kesempatan Indonesia untuk melakukan transformasi kesehatan. Saat ini banyak negara-negara mulai melegalkan sel punca embrionik dengan memanfaatkan sisa embrio in vitro fertilazation yang ditinggalkan begitu saja oleh pemiliknya. Hal ini menjawab perdebatan dahulu terkait metode sel punca embrionik yang bersumber pada janin atau embrio yang diambil dari rahim seorang ibu. Beberapa sumber penelitian mengatakan bahwa sel punca embrionik lebih memiliki potensi besar dibanding sel punca non embrionik. Atas dasar itu, menarik untuk dikaji bagaimana Undang-Undang Kesehatan Indonesia menanggapi perkembangan ini dan komitment untuk bertransformasi dalam hal kesehatan. Pembaharuan dalamĀ  penelitian ini berfokus pada menjawab penelitian yang sudah ada yang lebih mengkategorikan sel punca embrionik sebagai hal yang melanggar etika makhluk hidup dan melarang keras penggunaan sel punca embrionik. Metode penelitian ini adalah normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang- undangan dan komparatif. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini ialah pertama, sel punca embrionik lebih memiliki potensi besar ketimbang sel punca dewasa yang saat ini digunakan dan Negara-negara di dunia mulai melegalisasi penggunaan sel punca embrionik dengan memanfaatkan sisa embrio in vitro fertilazation. Kedua, Indonesia masih belum mampu melakukan transformasi kesehatan dengan dengan memanfaatkan instrumen hukum, sebagaimana konsideran Undang-Undang Kesehatan dan Teori Hukum Pembangunan.
Pertanggungjawaban Manajemen RS PHC Surabaya dalam Perekrutan Praktik Dokter Ilegal berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan Sari, Jayanti Purnama; Santosa, Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi; Kartika, I Gusti Ayu Putri; Winata, I Gde Sastra
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i1.14199

Abstract

The case of an illegal doctor named Susanto who worked at Primasatya Husada Citra Surabaya Hospital for approximately 3 years has troubled the community in Surabaya City. This study aims to determine the role of the Hospital Medical Committee of Primasatya Husada Citra Surabaya Hospital in supervising the recruitment process of doctors and the implications for patients who get the wrong dose and/or actions performed by illegal doctor Susanto. The research method used is normative juridical which involves analyzing documents or secondary data. The approach used in this research is qualitative research and is presented descriptively. The results showed that the Medical Committee of PHC Surabaya Hospital did not succeed in carrying out its duties optimally, thus allowing Susanto, who was actually unqualified, to obtain a position as an illegal doctor. The implication for patients who received the wrong dose and/or action performed by the illegal doctor Susanto is that the patient has the right to file a lawsuit to obtain compensation and justice. Lawsuits can be in the form of criminal charges and civil suits.