Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
David Boy Sumurung Silaban
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ENFORCEMENT OF FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND JAPAN David Boy Sumurung Silaban; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3867

Abstract

The principle of fair law enforcement is a manifestation of the state adhering to the conception of the rule of law (rechtsstaat) as the ideal of the nation. This makes the Indonesian judiciary have an important role and the principles of simplicity, quick and low cost as mandated by the 1945 Constitution and Act no 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Enforcement of material law cannot be separated from enforcement of formal law, because both run with the aim of realizing a sense of justice for the community. Likewise, the enforcement of judicial decisions: which is a law that must be implemented by the Parties in dispute in it; must be realized for the sake of justice for the entitled Parties. Statistical data reveals that administrative court decisions are often not implemented by administrative agencies/officials. A comparison of the decision execution system between Indonesia and Japan provides an interesting insight into how the two countries, which have different historical backgrounds and judicial systems, enforce the law and execute decisions. This journal focuses on how the policies of the Administrative Court in Indonesia and the Japanese judiciary in executing Inkracht judgments. This analytical comparative study is expected to be a vehicle for scientific and practical exploration related to the fulfillment of rights and obligations for Parties in court disputes. The method used in this research is normative research method with conceptual approach and statutory approach. Some data and statistics from reliable sources are presented as facts that will be analyzed in this journal article..
Co-Authors Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara