Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator dalam Kasus Suap Red Notice Djoko Tjandra Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 48/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst Aulia, Arief; Nurkholim
Action Research Literate Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/arl.v8i6.407

Abstract

Justice Collaborator memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam mengungkap kasus tindak pidana korupsi meskipun dalam praktiknya seringkali terjadi masalah seperti masalah perlindungan, pemberian penghargan, mekanisme mengajukan perlindungan dan penetapan status Justice Collaborator. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap Justice Collaborator dalam kasus Suap Red Notice Djoko Tjandra ditinjau dari hasil putusan sidang nomor: 48/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/Pn.Jkt.Pst; dan kendala yang terjadi dalam pemberian perlindungan hukum terhadap Justice Collaborator. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah Deskriptif Analitis yaitu menggambarkan serta menguraikan semua data yang diperoleh dari studi perpustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Penetapan status Justice Collaborator terhadap terdakwa dalam kasus suap penghapusan Red Notice Djoko Tjandra menimbulkan implikasi yuridis bagi terdakwa, yaitu berupa hak-hak yang diperoleh yakni berupa : Perlindungan fisik dan psikis; Perlindungan hukum; Penanganan secara khusus; dan Penghargaan. Selain hak, Justice Collaborator juga memiliki kewajiban diantaranya dengan memberikan keterangan dan bukti-bukti yang sangat signifikan sehingga penyidik dan/atau penuntut umum dapat mengungkap tindak pidana secara efektif, mengungkap pelaku-pelaku lainnya yang memiliki peran lebih besar dan/atau mengembalikan aset-aset/hasil suatu tindak pidana. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan, penulis menyimpulkan beberapa hal sebagai berikut. Pertama, penetapan status Justice Collaborator bagi Tommy Sumardi dalam kasus suap penghapusan Red Notice Djoko Tjandra memiliki dampak hukum yang signifikan. Dengan mengungkap perilaku koruptif kepada aparat penegak hukum, Tommy Sumardi mendapatkan berbagai perlindungan dan hak khusus sebagai Justice Collaborator.
Legal Analysis of the Crime of Attempting to Conduct a Fisheries Business Without a Business License (SIUP): : A Study of the North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Prk/2024/PN Jkt.Utr. Hilda Nur Khaliza; Nurkholim
DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL HUKUM DE' RECHTSSTAAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v12i1.22309

Abstract

Indonesia's rich fishery resources are vulnerable to illegal business practices, one of which is the absence of a Fishing Business Permit (SIUP). Unfinished illegal acts (attempts) often go unnoticed, even though they have a significant preventive impact. This study aims to analyze and understand the application of attempted crimes (poging) in the context of fisheries crimes without an SIUP and to analyze the criminal liability imposed on perpetrators based on the North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Prk/2024/PN Jkt.Utr. This study uses a normative legal research method with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data sources used are primary legal materials in the form of legislation (Criminal Code and Fisheries Law) and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature and criminal law doctrine. The approaches used are case studies and a legislative approach. The concept of attempted crime (Article 53 of the Criminal Code) has been proven to be effectively applicable in cases of unfinished fisheries crimes. The North Jakarta District Court's decision shows that the elements of intent, commencement of execution, and incompleteness due to external factors (arrest) have been fulfilled, so that fisheries crimes can be prosecuted from the initial stage. The perpetrator was also proven to have fulfilled the element of fault (mens rea) in the form of intent because he acted with full awareness that his actions were against the law, thus making him liable for criminal responsibility. It is recommended that authorities increase patrols and surveillance, and that the government simplify the SIUP licensing procedure to reduce the motivation for illegal activities.