Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JISTECH: Journal of Information Science and Technology Action Research Literate (ARL)
Puteri, Mayang K. F.
Unknown Affiliation
Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Pengaruh Kompetensi, Loyalitas, dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap. Kinerja Pekerja Perusahaan Konstruksi di Manokwari Anthoni, Yudha D.P; Puteri, Mayang K. F.; Birawaputra, Indra; Pasaribu , Haryanto Pandapotan
Action Research Literate Vol. 9 No. 8 (2025): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/arl.v9i8.3013

Abstract

Keterbatasan tenaga kerja lokal yang terampil di Papua Barat menjadi kendala utama dalam penyelesaian proyek konstruksi. Minimnya perhatian terhadap pengembangan sumber daya manusia, seperti peningkatan kompetensi, loyalitas, dan disiplin kerja, pada pihak penyedia jasa konstruksi turut menghambat upaya optimalisasi kinerja proyek. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh kompetensi, loyalitas, dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja pekerja konstruksi di Kabupaten Manokwari. Menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan regresi, sampel diambil secara purposive dari pekerja konstruksi di tiga perusahaan besar. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner berbasis skala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan uji validitas, reliabilitas, regresi linear berganda, serta uji hipotesis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi merupakan faktor yang paling signifikan dalam mempengaruhi kinerja pekerja konstruksi di Manokwari. Nilai t hitung kompetensi (2,066) lebih besar dari t tabel (2,017), mengindikasikan pengaruh positif yang signifikan. Meskipun loyalitas (t hitung 0,517) dan disiplin kerja (t hitung 0,641) secara individu tidak berpengaruh signifikan, namun secara simultan, ketiga variabel (F hitung 5,091 > F tabel 2,83) memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap kinerja.
Penerapan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja Menggunakan Metode HIRADC Pada Struktur Bawah Gedung DPRD Manokwari Selatan: Application of Occupational Safety and Health Using the HIRADC Method on the Lower Structure of the South Manokwari DPRD Building Susilo, Aprisillia K.; Puteri, Mayang K. F.; Marini, Lion F.
JISTECH: Journal of Information Science and Technology Vol 12 No 1 (2023): Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): April 2023
Publisher : Universitas Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30862/jistech.v12i1.208

Abstract

The number of work accidents in the construction sector in the world is generally higher than the number of accidents in other sectors such as the manufacturing and industrial sectors due to the lack of K3 construction experts as well as the low awareness of workers in the field. Therefore, the K3 program is implemented to prevent work accidents. The purpose of this research is to be able to identify a hazard, analyze work risks, and determine controls using the HIRADC method on the lower structure of the South Manokwari Regional House of Representatives building. This study used a qualitative analysis method by carrying out and making observations in the field, distributing questionnaires to 8 informants, and interviewing the main informants, namely K3 experts. Based on the results of an analysis of the lower structure of the South Manokwari Regency Regional House of Representatives building, 141 accident risks were identified for each job with a percentage of the risk level before control was carried out, namely extreme risk (E) of 16,31%, high risk (H) of 35,46%, moderate risk (M) of 45,39%, and Low risk (L) of 2,84%. These results are still very high, so it is necessary to carry out a control. After controlling, the risk level decreased drastically, and at safe limits, the results were: extreme risk (E) of 0,00%, high risk (H) of 0,00%, moderate risk (M) of 19,15%, and Low risk (L) of 80,85%.
Co-Authors Anthoni, Yudha D.P Birawaputra, Indra Marini, Lion F. Pasaribu , Haryanto Pandapotan Susilo, Aprisillia K.