Claudio Junior Willem Rambing
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Keadilan Prosedural dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Perkara Perdata (Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 555 PK/Pdt/2023) Reynold Simandjuntak; Claudio Junior Willem Rambing
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i4.7481

Abstract

Judicial review (PK) in the Indonesian legal system often presents a tug-of-war between the principles of procedural justice and legal certainty, particularly following the expansion of the scope of judicial review through various regulations and court procedures. This article specifically examines Supreme Court (MA) Decision Number 555 PK/Pdt/2023 as a case study to assess the extent to which the Supreme Court is able to balance these two principles in civil court practice. Using a juridical-normative approach and analyzing empirical data, this article finds that while judicial review functions as a corrector of judicial errors to achieve substantive justice, its application must still be strictly limited by clear formal and material standards to maintain stability and legal certainty in the judicial system. This study recommends strengthening guidelines for evaluating new evidence and reforming judicial review mechanisms that are more adaptive to modern legal developments, so that justice and legal certainty can coexist in Indonesian judicial practice.
Implikasi Putusan Pengadilan terhadap Keabsahan Perubahan Data Akta Kelahiran dalam Pencatatan Sipil Marven Ajels Kasenda; Daniel Reihan Palar; Claudio Junior Willem Rambing; Olivia Zefanya Karundeng; Esther Tesalonika Putrigrace Liuw; Sisilia Koloay; Sefania Gloria
Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i1.6037

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal implications of court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force (inkracht) on the validity of changes to birth certificate data. Amendments to civil documents such as birth certificates do not merely involve administrative issues but also directly affect an individual’s legal status. In practice, many people face obstacles when seeking data corrections, especially when discrepancies arise between existing data and supporting documents. This research employs a normative juridical approach by analyzing laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and a case study of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Decision No. 587 K/Pdt/2021 as the primary focus. The analysis centers on the legal reasoning adopted by the panel of judges in granting the request for data correction, and how the decision binds the civil registration authority to execute the ordered amendment. The findings reveal that a court decision with permanent legal standing serves as a crucial legal instrument to ensure the validity and legality of population data changes. Moreover, this legal mechanism reinforces civil protection within the national administrative framework. The study also recommends enhancing coordination between judicial institutions and civil registry offices to streamline data correction procedures and prevent legal uncertainty. In this regard, the study provides an academic contribution to the development of administrative law and the protection of citizens' legal rights.