Harjono, Dhaniswara K
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Is State Licensure Enough? Evaluating the Gaps and Proposing a Specialized Credentialing Model for Aesthetic Medical Practice in Indonesia Yeo, Susilo Kurniawan; Harjono, Dhaniswara K; Pieris, John; Panjaitan, Hulman
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2257

Abstract

This study examines the weaknesses of the regulatory framework for aesthetic medical practice in Indonesia, which have led to a public health crisis due to malpractice by incompetent practitioners. The objective of this research is to design a specialized credentialing model to ensure patient safety and legal certainty. Using a normative legal research methodology through statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the regulatory systems in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The results show that Indonesia, relying solely on general medical licenses (STR and SIP), operates in a regulatory vacuum. In contrast, Malaysia, with its Letter of Credentialing and Privileging (LCP) system, and Singapore, with its Certificate of Competence (COC), have successfully implemented frameworks focused on procedural competency. As a solution, a hybrid model is proposed for Indonesia, the "Aesthetic Competency Certificate", which combines evidence-based risk stratification from Singapore and the renewable privileging mechanism from Malaysia. This model would be managed by a national committee, mandate standardized training, and be supported by a public registry to ensure accountability and protect the public.
Legal Development of the Validity of Electronic Mortgage Certificates in the Land Registration System in Indonesia Harjono, Dhaniswara K
Yustisia Vol 11, No 2: August 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v11i2.61111

Abstract

Electronic encumbrance Right is one of the breakthroughs made by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs to improve services in the land sector and support the Government in realizing a digital bureaucracy in Indonesia. This paper aims to deeply examine the validity and execution of such electronic Encumbrance Right Certificates.The main findings show that the electronic Encumbrance Right Certificate cannot be separated from the provisions of the Electronic Information and Transactions law, which lays out the conditions that must be met for the validity of electronic certificates and their status as evidence in court. The problem of authentication differs from the acknowledgement of electronic data. If the data or electronic documents are accepted or legally recognized, the authentication process for the data will automatically follow. The authentication process is a matter of technology while acknowledging electronic documents involves formal recognition in laws and regulations. Electronic evidence consisting of Electronic Information or Electronic Documents or the printouts produced by the Electronic System is legal evidence. On the other hand, if the Electronic Information is not generated through the Electronic System, the evidence cannot automatically be assessed as valid. Such electronic information can be used as electronic evidence if the authenticity, accuracy, and integrity have been verified through an information technology forensic audit