Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan dan Pengendalian Diri terhadap Manajemen Keuangan Pribadi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Angkatan 2022-2025 Universitas Negeri Medan Putri Yasmin; Daffany Viroza; Seniman Hati Zebua; Hesly Irawanda Naibaho; Gita Mori Sevira Br Tarigan
Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): OKTOBER 2025
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh literasi keuangan dan pengendalian diri (self control) terhadap manajemen keuangan pribadi mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas Negeri Medan angkatan 2022-2025. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasari oleh fenomena kurang optimalnya pengelolaan keuangan mahasiswa, yang sering kali disebabkan oleh rendahnya pemahaman keuangan dan lemahnya kemampuan mengendalikan diri terhadap pengeluaran. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif dengan metode survei menggunakan kuesioner. Populasi penelitian meliputi seluruh mahasiswa aktif program studi akuntansi, dengan sampel sebanyak 50 responden yang diambil melalui teknik simple random sampling. Data dianalisis menggunakan regresi linier berganda dengan bantuan program SPSS versi 26. Hasil uji F menunjukkan bahwa literasi keuangan dan self control secara simultan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap manajemen keuangan pribadi. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa kedua variabel independen berpengaruh signifikan secara parsial, dengan self control memiliki pengaruh paling dominan. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa mahasiswa yang memiliki tingkat literasi keuangan tinggi dan kemampuan mengendalikan diri yang baik cenderung mampu mengelola keuangannya dengan lebih efektif dan bertanggung jawab. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya peningkatan literasi keuangan serta pengendalian diri melalui pembelajaran dan edukasi keuangan di lingkungan perguruan tinggi.
Persepsi Mahasiswa UNIMED Tentang Pembentukan Undang-Undang Kilat, Studi Kasus: (Undang-Undang Kontroversial Di Universitas Negara Medan) Nuh Yabest Sinaga; Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan; Novridah Reanti Purba; Muhammad Arif Siagian; Daffany Viroza; Anggie Pricyla Sianturi; Gita Mori Sevira Br Tarigan
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Juli: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD)
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurdikbud.v5i2.6168

Abstract

Fast-track legislation refers to a legislative process that proceeds rapidly, oftenwithout adequatepublic participation and is considered lacking in transparency.This study employs a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniquesincluding observation, interviews, and documentation. The number of respondentsto be studied is approximately ten. The research focuses on one or more laws thatare considered controversial by the public, such as the Military Law (TNI Law), theJob Creation Law (Omnibus Law), and the Mineral and Coal Mining Law (MinerbaLaw). The aim of this study is to analyze the perceptions of Unimed students towardthe formation of fast-track legislation, particularly those that frequently sparkpublic controversy. This study aims to analyze the perceptions of Unimed studentsregarding the formation of fast-tracked legislation, particularly those that oftentrigger public controversy. The research is expected to provide an overview of theextent to which students understand, respond to, and critique the practice ofexpedited lawmaking, as well as highlight its impact on public trust in the legal drafting process in Indonesia. The findings indicate that the majority of UNIMEDstudents have a negative perception of fast-tracked legislation, as the process isconsidered rushed, lacks public participation, and does not follow a transparentdeliberative mechanism. The conclusion of this study is that the absence of publicinvolvement in the legislative process strengthens students' distrust in legislativeinstitutions, fosters a skeptical attitude, and even encourages their involvement incritical movements as a form of social control.
Persepsi Mahasiswa UNIMED Tentang Pembentukan Undang-Undang Kilat, Studi Kasus: (Undang-Undang Kontroversial Di Universitas Negara Medan) Nuh Yabest Sinaga; Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan; Novridah Reanti Purba; Muhammad Arif Siagian; Daffany Viroza; Anggie Pricyla Sianturi; Gita Mori Sevira Br Tarigan
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Juli: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JURDIKBUD)
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurdikbud.v5i2.6168

Abstract

Fast-track legislation refers to a legislative process that proceeds rapidly, oftenwithout adequatepublic participation and is considered lacking in transparency.This study employs a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniquesincluding observation, interviews, and documentation. The number of respondentsto be studied is approximately ten. The research focuses on one or more laws thatare considered controversial by the public, such as the Military Law (TNI Law), theJob Creation Law (Omnibus Law), and the Mineral and Coal Mining Law (MinerbaLaw). The aim of this study is to analyze the perceptions of Unimed students towardthe formation of fast-track legislation, particularly those that frequently sparkpublic controversy. This study aims to analyze the perceptions of Unimed studentsregarding the formation of fast-tracked legislation, particularly those that oftentrigger public controversy. The research is expected to provide an overview of theextent to which students understand, respond to, and critique the practice ofexpedited lawmaking, as well as highlight its impact on public trust in the legal drafting process in Indonesia. The findings indicate that the majority of UNIMEDstudents have a negative perception of fast-tracked legislation, as the process isconsidered rushed, lacks public participation, and does not follow a transparentdeliberative mechanism. The conclusion of this study is that the absence of publicinvolvement in the legislative process strengthens students' distrust in legislativeinstitutions, fosters a skeptical attitude, and even encourages their involvement incritical movements as a form of social control.