Wenceslaus, Wenceslaus
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Reconstruction of the Position of Tax Courts Following the Issue of Constitutional Court Decisions No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 Wenceslaus, Wenceslaus; Surono, Agus; Hamid , Adnan; Retnaningsih, Sonyendah; Teepapal , Tanawat
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1711

Abstract

As stated in Article 1(8) of the Judicial Power Act, tax courts are special courts under the Supreme Court and part of the judicial branch. According to Article 1(5) of the Tax Court Law, tax disputes are those arising in the field of taxation between taxpayers and authorized officials as a result of a decision that can be appealed or challenged in the Tax Court, in accordance with tax laws and regulations. This includes lawsuits regarding the enforcement of tax collection based on the Tax Collection Act with a Summons. Law No. 17 of 1997 on Tax Collection by Means of a Forced Execution Letter regulates tax disputes arising from tax collection actions by officials that do not comply with legal procedures, causing taxpayers to feel aggrieved. Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 is based on Article 24(1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which states that the Supreme Court and the courts under its authority exercise judicial power. The decision reaffirms that the Tax Court is part of the judicial power and that the Supreme Court must supervise it. Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 aims to enhance the Tax Court's independence. Transferring the authority for the organization, administration, and finance of the Tax Court from the Ministry of Finance to the Supreme Court is expected to achieve this goal. Prior to the decision, the Tax Court was under the Supreme Court within the Administrative Court System. The Tax Court was also under the Ministry of Finance in terms of organizational, administrative, and financial supervision in accordance with Article 5(2) of Law No. 14 of 2002 on the Tax Court. However, the arrangement of the status of tax courts following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023 has raised the issue that the decision does not automatically amend the provisions of Law No. 14 of 2002 on Tax Courts, particularly Article 5(2). According to Constitutional Court Decision No. 26/PUU-XXI/2023, the Supreme Court is responsible for supervising the organization, administration, and finances of the Tax Courts. However, Article 5(2) of Law No. 14 of 2002 of the Republic of Indonesia on Tax Courts grants the Ministry of Finance the authority to supervise the organization, administration, and finances of the Tax Courts. These conflicting provisions result in the loss of the Tax Court's status as an independent judicial institution.
Hak Ulayat sebagai Manifestasi Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam: Analisis Kasus Masyarakat Adat Dayak Kenyah di Kalimantan Timur Surono, Agus; Wenceslaus, Wenceslaus
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i2.422

Abstract

This research departs from the paradox between the state's normative recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples and the reality of structural marginalization experienced by the Dayak Kenyah community in Pampang Village, East Kalimantan. Customary rights as a system of communal ownership have not only legal value, but also spiritual and ecological dimensions that are in line with the principles  of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, in particular ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of property) and ḥifẓ al-bi'ah (protection of the environment). This study uses a normative legal approach supported by qualitative case studies to analyze the relationship between customary law, national law, and Islamic law in natural resource governance. Data was collected through analysis of laws and regulations, court decisions, and interviews with traditional stakeholders. The results of the study show that there is an overlap of sectoral regulations, complicated bureaucracy for verification of customary rights, and the dominance of state economic interests that get rid of customary authorities. The analysis of maqāṣid al-sharī'ah shows that the recognition of customary rights is a tangible manifestation of social justice and ecological responsibility mandated by Islamic law. Therefore, strengthening customary institutions, harmonizing sectoral regulations, and implementing the principle  of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) are strategic steps towards fair, sustainable, and maqāṣid governance.