Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Prognostic factors of brain metastases affecting survival: an Indonesian cohort Koesbandono, Koesbandono; Muljadi, Rusli; Sutanto, Ratna; Hendriansyah, Lutfi; Kristiani, Erna; Faustina, Carissa; Christanti, Jessica
Universa Medicina Vol. 44 No. 3 (2025): Ahead Of Print
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/UnivMed.2025.v44.298-309

Abstract

BackgroundBrain metastases (BMs) most frequently originate from primary tumors of the lung and breast, and significantly impact cancer patient prognosis. Metastases can be detected synchronously along with the primary tumor or metachronously, following treatment of localized disease. The objective of this study was to identify key prognostic factors influencing survival in synchronous metastases (SM) and metachronous metastases (MM), focusing on metastatic duration, tumor volume response, and gamma knife radiosurgery. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 100 patients with brain metastases (48 synchronous, 52 metachronous). Age, gender, primary tumor, gamma knife status, metastasis location, peritumoral index group, volume reduction, metastatic duration, metastasis characteristics, and intensity pattern based on MRI. A Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the data. Based on the Cox regression coefficients, a prognostic index was constructed. ResultsCalculated HR comprised MM (HR=0.49;95% CI :0.24–0.97], gamma knife treatment (HR = 0.15;95% CI: 0.07–0.29], and volume response (HR=0.40;95% CI: 0.16–0.99), all indicating a significantly reduced mortality risk. A prognostic index was calculated for all patients; those with scores ≤–1.513 were classified as low risk. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the low-risk group had a significantly longer mean survival period (75.52 months) compared to the high-risk group (31.43 months) (p<0.001). ConclusionMetachronous presentation, gamma knife therapy, and greater tumor volume reduction independently predict better survival. The developed prognostic index provides a clinically useful tool for personalized risk assessment and treatment planning in patients with brain metastases.
Specialty Collaboration in Managing School Age Child with Nasofrontal Meningoencephalocele: A Case Report Salsabila, Yunia Tasya; Pribadi, Sweety; Hendriansyah, Lutfi; Pramono, Graciella Novian Triana Wahjoe
Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): (2024) Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi
Publisher : The Lingkar Studi Bedah Plastik Foundation and is affiliated with the Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14228/jprjournal.v11i2.387

Abstract

Introduction : Meningoencephalocele is one form of neural tube defect that forms a sac containing brain tissue, meninges, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). It can cause structural deformities and many other clinical symptoms that come after. Many medical consultations are needed for the case. The collaboration between neurosurgeon and plastic surgeon plays a significant role in managing this case.Case Report : A case of a 10-year old boy with an apple-size lump in his nasofrontal region, nasal congestion, and central visual field disturbance. The patient has not undergone an examination or surgery in a long time because he lives in a rural area. Radiological results show herniaton brain tissue, meninges, and CSF protruding through the defect in the frontal bone of the cranium that suggest meningoencephalocele as a diagnosis.Discussion : The definitive management for this case is through surgery. Selecting a surgical technique for meningoencephalocele is essential for optimizing the outcomes and minimizing the risks. The Chula technique approach was chosen for the implementation of this surgery. In this case, we describe the modified Chula technique with stages adjusted according to the patient’s condition. Plastic surgery complements many aspects of reconstruction and restores aesthetic subunits. Managing this case was a challenge until the recovery period. The surgery was successfully performed, and patient went home without any serious complications.Summary: Caution is necessary in handling surgery and involves aesthetic creativity within it. Long-term monitoring is necessary for post-operative results since many clinical aspects and social developments must be regularly evaluated.