Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR)
Leatemia, Philip Joseph
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Judicial Review of Article 27 (3) and (4) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2008 (19 of 2016) Against the Criminalization of Advocates' Immunity Rights (Case Study: Advocate Alvin Lim, Advocate Kamaruddin Simanjutak and Advocate Prayitno) Susilo, Budhi; Kian, Antonius Maria Laot; Leatemia, Philip Joseph
East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/eajmr.v3i1.7941

Abstract

This research aims to study the degradation of advocates' immunity rights in Indonesia with special emphasis on Article 27 Paragraph (3) and Paragraph (4). This research is normative juridical in nature by using secondary data such as laws and regulations, court decisions, and other references to see the requirements of immunity rights, types of degradation caused by the Information and Transactions Electronic (ITE) Law, and factors that hinder and support immunity rights. The results of this research analysis are: First of all, the terms of advocates' immunity rights, which include the presence or absence of criminal and civil legal actions. If advocates carry out their work in an ethical manner, they will be protected, but ethical violations will be submitted to the Advocates Organization Code Council. Second, the cause of the reduction of advocates' immunity rights caused by Article 27 Paragraph (3) dan Paragraph (4) of the ITE Law identified that the effect of criminal and civil penalties can reduce the immunity rights of advocates in performing their professional duties. Third, the elements that hinder and support advocates' immunity rights are the functions of investigators, public prosecutors, judges, and public opinion.
Co-Authors Antonius Maria Laot Kian, Antonius Maria Laot Susilo, Budhi