Alfiandini, Ratna Nurlia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tingkat Pengetahuan Ustadz /Ustadzah pada Pola Makan Sehat Santri/Santriwati di Lingkungan Pondok Pesantren Narmada, Ida Bagus; Alfiandini, Ratna Nurlia; Putranto, Ananda Firman
Jurnal Promotif Preventif Vol 7 No 6 (2024): Desember 2024: JURNAL PROMOTIF PREVENTIF
Publisher : Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Pancasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47650/jpp.v7i6.1587

Abstract

Di lingkungan pesantren, terdapat sejumlah permasalahan khusus terkait status gizi para santri sehingga diperlukan penguatan peran pos kesehatan, seperti di Pondok Pesantren Tahfidz Al-Qur’an Karangmojo, untuk mendukung upaya pencegahan dan penurunan angka permasalahan gizi pada remaja. Ustadz dan Ustadzah, sebagai pembimbing, akan bertugas mendukung Poskestren Sehingga perlu diketahui tingkat pengetahuan ustadz dan ustadzah terkait pemberian gizi pada santri dan santriwati. Penelitian ini menggunakan studi deksriptif untuk mengetahui tingkat pengetahuan ustadz dan ustadzah. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh ustadz dan ustadzah Pondok Tahfidz Al-Qur’an Karangmojo, Kabupaten Ponorogo berjumlah sebelas orang. Sedangkan sampel penelitian adalah seluruh anggota populasi dengan teknik pengambilan sampel adalah Total Sampling. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan berupa tes kuesioner tertutup. Kuesioner yang digunakan menggunakan skala Likert yang memiliki 4 pilihan jawaban, antara lain, sangat setuju, setuju, tidak setuju dan sangat tidak setuju. Kriteria penilaian berdasarkan skala Likert, dengan “Sangat Setuju” = 4 poin, “Setuju” = 3 poin, “Tidak Setuju” = 2 poin, “Sangat Tidak Setuju” = 1 poin. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa 47% besar ustadz dan ustadzah berusia 26-35 tahun dengan Pendidikan terakhir mayoritas adalah S1 (59%). Hasil menunjukkan bahwa tingkat pengetahuan ustadz dan ustadzah sangat baik dalam pembiasaan pola makan sehat bagi santri dan santriwati.
Aesthetic smile component before and after extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in Class I Angle malocclusion patient Winoto, Ervina Restiwulan; Alfiandini, Ratna Nurlia; Fahrial, Selvina Alisandra
Indonesian Journal of Dental Medicine Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Dental Medicine
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ijdm.v8i2.2025.73-76

Abstract

Background: Approximately 80% of Indonesians suffer from malocclusion, a disease related to oral health issues. Orthodontic treatment, whether extraction or non-extraction, enhances the smile's aesthetics and stomatognathic function. To guarantee a result that is both practical and aesthetically pleasing, treatment selection necessitates thorough investigation. Purpose: the aim of this study is to compare the appearance of smiles in class I Angle type 1 malocclusions before and after orthodontic treatment. Methods: This study is an analytical retrospective study using frontal photos and a sample of medical records of orthodontic patients who finished orthodontic treatment at the Dental Hospital/Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Pendidikan (RSGMP), Universitas Airlangga (UNAIR), between 2017 and 2024. There were 46 non-extraction cases and 37 extraction cases. Result: Following premolar extraction, the buccal corridor increased by 3.11% ± 7.33% (p < 0.05) and the smile width by 1.49% ± 4.43%. Only grin breadth increased significantly (1.64% ± 4.23%) in the non-extraction group. There were no discernible differences between the extraction and non-extraction groups in Class I Angle malocclusion patients, according to the independent t-test findings. Conclusion: The extraction and non-extraction groups' average smile aesthetics scores before and after treatment do not differ significantly in Class I Angle malocclusion patients at RSGMP UNAIR.
Transverse dimension maxillary arch smile aesthetics comparison in non-extraction and extraction in Class I Angle malocclusion Amalia, Fatimah Nur; Winoto, Ervina Restiwulan; Alfiandini, Ratna Nurlia
Indonesian Journal of Dental Medicine Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Dental Medicine
Publisher : Faculty of Dental Medicine Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ijdm.v8i2.2025.77-80

Abstract

Background: Malocclusion may affect aesthetic facial profile, and oral health-related quality of life. There are two orthodontic treatments to improve the facial profile, especially the aesthetics of the transverse dimension maxillary smile aesthetic (TDMASA), namely, extraction and non-extraction in the orthodontic treatments. Purpose: This study was conducted in order to compare extraction and non-extraction in orthodontic treatment on the aesthetics of TDMASA variables in patients with Class I Angle type 1 malocclusion at Dental Hospital / Rumah Sakit Gigi dan Mulut Pendidikan (RSGMP,) Universitas Airlangga (UNAIR) in the period 2017-2024. Methods: There were 19 extraction samples and 33 non-extraction samples, taken by means of total sampling technique. Intercanine Width (ICW) and Inter Molar Width (IMW) were measured using digital calipers. Smile width (SW) and maximum dental width (MDW) were measured using ImageJ software. Data analysis used a paired t-test to determine the difference in ICW, IMW, SW, and MDW and the ratio of ICW/SW, ICW/MDW, and MDW/SW before and after extraction and non-extraction treatments and an independent t-test to compare the results of ICW, IMW, SW, and MDW and the ratio of ICW/SW, ICW/MDW, and MDW/SW between extraction and non-extraction treatments. Results: There was a significant increase in ICW, IMW, SW, MDW, and MDW/SW ratio, and a significant decrease in ICW/SW and ICW/MDW in the extraction group (P<0.05). Conclusion: There was a significant difference in extraction and non-extraction case in orthodontic treatment on the aesthetics of TDMASA variables in patients with Class I Angle type 1 malocclusion.