Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

BEDĪ’UZZAMĀN SA’ĪD NŪRSĪ ON SOCIAL JUSTICE: ANALYSIS FROM ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY TRADITION Al Faruqi, Achmad Reza Hutama; Ma’afi, Rif’at Husnul; Kamal, Aria Nur
Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 11 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Kontemplasi
Publisher : UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/kontem.2023.11.1.25-48

Abstract

Masalah Keadilan Sosial tetap aktual meski tak baru, sulit diselesaikan karena situasi wilayah berbeda. Artikel ini menggunakan metode deskriptif-analitis dengan contoh kontemporer untuk menjaga relevansi diskusi. Nursi, melalui Rasā'il Nūr, mengulas keadilan sebagai pencerahan atas persoalan yang belum teratasi. Nursi menegaskan bahwa harmoni dan ketertiban dalam kehidupan, berakar pada nilai-nilai Islam dalam Al-Qur'an. Ia berargumen bahwa Al-Qur'an menjadi cara mengembalikan martabat kemanusiaan. Rasā'il Nūr, interpretasi Al-Qur'an oleh Nursi, mengubah pandangan Thullabbunnur dari perspektif Barat ke perspektif Islam dalam era sekularisasi Turki, bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keadilan sosial.
The Concept of the Soul (Nafs) in Islamic Philosophy: A Comparative Study of Ibn Sina’s and Ibn Bajjah’s Thought Muslih, Mohammad Kholid; Kamal, Aria Nur; Faturrahman, Mochammad Eka
Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jitp.2025.4.2.208-223

Abstract

This study examines and compares the concept of nafs in the works of two prominent Paripatetic Muslim philosophers: Ibn Sina and Ibn Bajjah. Both philosophers played important roles in developing the theory of the soul in the Islamic philosophical tradition. Though their views are often considered to be influenced by Greek philosophy, particularly Aristotelianism, this study seeks to demonstrate that their concept of nafs is an original contribution with a strong foundation in the Qur'an and Sunnah. Using a qualitative approach, the study collects data from the primary works of both figures as well as relevant secondary literature. The analysis reveals key differences between the two philosophers. First, Ibn Sina divides the types of nafs into three: the vegetable soul, the animal soul, and the human soul. In contrast, Ibn Bajjah analyzes the nafs more simply, focusing on its power. Second, regarding the immortality of the nafs, Ibn Sina's view is more comprehensive than Ibn Bajjah's, which limits immortality to the mind and the nafs natiqah. Third, regarding the perfection of the nafs, Ibn Sina emphasizes its perfection as a whole, whereas Ibn Bajjah limits it to the context of active reason.