Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Technomedia Journal
Fabyanto, Ikhsan
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Software Based Geotechnical Analysis of Spillway Slope Reinforcement Fabyanto, Ikhsan; Zaki, Muhammad; Pontan, Darmawan; Widiarso, Tulus
Technomedia Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Pandawan Incorporation, Alphabet Incubator Universitas Raharja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33050/zzgyr313

Abstract

The construction of large-scale infrastructure such as dams requires precise planning and implementation to ensure structural stability and long-term operational safety. This study aims to analyze slope protection and embankment reinforcement at the spillway excavation area of the Dam Project in Surian District, located in the 137 km-long Cipunagara River Basin. A quantitative approach was applied, using geotechnical modeling software Plaxis 8.6 and Microsoft Excel for data processing. Three slope reinforcement methods were compared: geomat, shotcrete, and cocomesh. Based on the analysis, slope reinforcement using shotcrete achieved the highest safety factor, with short-term SF = 1.649 (34.50% increase) and long-term SF = 1.514 (23.49% increase). Geomat ranked second with SF = 1.544 (25.94%) and 1.418 (15.66%), while cocomesh obtained SF = 1.540 (25.61%) and 1.355 (10.52%). The unreinforced slope had an SF of 1.226. In terms of cost, shotcrete was the most expensive at IDR 4,331,068,967.23, followed by geomat (IDR 2,734,025,024.50) and cocomesh (IDR 906,745,000.00). However, shotcrete also required the longest construction time (30 days) compared to geomat (20 days) and cocomesh (16 days). Shotcrete provides the best technical performance for slope stability, but geomat and cocomesh are more efficient alternatives in terms of cost and time, offering a balanced solution for slope reinforcement projects.
Co-Authors Muhammad Zaki Pontan, Darmawan Tulus Widiarso