Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bina Hukum Lingkungan Bina Hukum Lingkungan Unifikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Suryani, Anna
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Transformasi Regulasi Pertambangan dan Dinamika Variabel Strategis Suryani, Anna; Darmawan, Iwan; Satory, Agus
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 1, Oktober 2025
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i1.469

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perubahan variabel utama menurut Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 3 tahun 2020 dan Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 4 tahun 2009. Seiring dengan diterbitkannya Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 3 tahun 2020 yang mengatur tentang hilirisasi, terjadi transformasi dalam konstelasi tata Aturan yang membawa konsekwensi pada perubahan struktur variabel utama di dalamnya. Penelitian ini memakai metode prospective analysis dengan alat bantu MICMAC (Matrix Cross- Reference Multiplcation Applied to a Classification) yang diperkuat dengan metode yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh data empiris. Penelitian ini menggunakan Teori Hukum Positivisme sebagai pisau analisis. Hasil menunjukkan pergeseran dan perubahan. Pada Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 ditemukan hanya ada tiga variabel (Kondisi Sosial Politik, Dinamika Politik Kawasan, Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup) dan pada Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 variabel utama ada tujuh variabel (Kondisi Sosial Politik , Kondisi Perekonomian Nasional, Perubahan Kebijakan Global, Hilirisasi dan Nilai Tambah, Stabilitas Pasar Komoditas Global, Komitmen terhadap Transparansi). Kata kunci: MICMAC; Prospective Analysis; Teori Hukum Positivisme; Transformasi; Variabel Strategi. ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to find out how the main variables change according to Law Number 3 of 2020 and Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. Along with the issuance of Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining which regulates downstreaming, there has been a transformation in the constellation of rules that bring consequences to changes in the structure of the main variables in it. This study uses a prospective analysis method with the MICMAC (Matrix Cross- Reference Multiplcation Applied to a Classification) tool which is strengthened by normative juridical methods supported by empirical data. This study uses the Legal Theory of Positivism as an analysis knife. The results show shifts and changes. In Law No.4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, it is found that there are only three variables (Socio-Political Conditions, Regional Political Dynamics, Environmental Protection) and in Law No.3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, there are seven main variables (Socio-Political Conditions, National Economic Conditions, Global Policy Changes, Downstreaming and Added Value, Global Commodity Market Stability, Commitment to Transparency).Keywords: MICMAC; Positivisme Law Theory; Prospective Analysis; Strategic Variable; Transformation.
Transformasi Regulasi Pertambangan dan Dinamika Variabel Strategis Suryani, Anna; Darmawan, Iwan; Satory, Agus
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 1, Oktober 2025
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i1.469

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perubahan variabel utama menurut Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 3 tahun 2020 dan Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 4 tahun 2009. Seiring dengan diterbitkannya Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 3 tahun 2020 yang mengatur tentang hilirisasi, terjadi transformasi dalam konstelasi tata Aturan yang membawa konsekwensi pada perubahan struktur variabel utama di dalamnya. Penelitian ini memakai metode prospective analysis dengan alat bantu MICMAC (Matrix Cross- Reference Multiplcation Applied to a Classification) yang diperkuat dengan metode yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh data empiris. Penelitian ini menggunakan Teori Hukum Positivisme sebagai pisau analisis. Hasil menunjukkan pergeseran dan perubahan. Pada Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 ditemukan hanya ada tiga variabel (Kondisi Sosial Politik, Dinamika Politik Kawasan, Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup) dan pada Undang-Undang Minerba Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 variabel utama ada tujuh variabel (Kondisi Sosial Politik , Kondisi Perekonomian Nasional, Perubahan Kebijakan Global, Hilirisasi dan Nilai Tambah, Stabilitas Pasar Komoditas Global, Komitmen terhadap Transparansi). Kata kunci: MICMAC; Prospective Analysis; Teori Hukum Positivisme; Transformasi; Variabel Strategi. ABSTRACTThe purpose of this paper is to find out how the main variables change according to Law Number 3 of 2020 and Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. Along with the issuance of Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining which regulates downstreaming, there has been a transformation in the constellation of rules that bring consequences to changes in the structure of the main variables in it. This study uses a prospective analysis method with the MICMAC (Matrix Cross- Reference Multiplcation Applied to a Classification) tool which is strengthened by normative juridical methods supported by empirical data. This study uses the Legal Theory of Positivism as an analysis knife. The results show shifts and changes. In Law No.4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, it is found that there are only three variables (Socio-Political Conditions, Regional Political Dynamics, Environmental Protection) and in Law No.3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, there are seven main variables (Socio-Political Conditions, National Economic Conditions, Global Policy Changes, Downstreaming and Added Value, Global Commodity Market Stability, Commitment to Transparency).Keywords: MICMAC; Positivisme Law Theory; Prospective Analysis; Strategic Variable; Transformation.
Legal Formalism in Amendments to Mining Law in Indonesia Suryani, Anna; Darmawan , Iwan; Satory, Agus
Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/unifikasi.v12i02.1198

Abstract

Mining law reform is associated with the constitutional mandate of Indonesia, prioritizing social justice and welfare of the people. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze, from both philosophical and constitutional perspectives, the evolution of Indonesian mining law regulations. The analysis also aimed to examine mining law reform as a transition from legal formalism toward a just, sustainable, and participatory constitutional framework. A normative legal process with a doctrinal method was used, which was supplemented by an analysis of legal philosophy through the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of law. Data sources included statutory regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and relevant academic literature on law and environment. The results showed that the shift in the new law generated tensions between the logic of centralization and the ideals of democratic resource management. Additionally, strengthening state control was not often accompanied by adequate checks and balances or the protection of community ecological rights. Amendments to Law on Mineral and Coal Mining produced significant philosophical and constitutional implications. As the new law reinforced state control through the centralization of authority, it simultaneously raised concerns about diminishing regional, indigenous, and public participation in natural resource governance. The importance of repositioning mining law as a constitutional instrument capable of ensuring substantive justice, ecological sustainability, and public participation was prioritized. Accordingly, the analysis recommended revising to promote inclusive participation, strengthen independent oversight, and empower the Constitutional Court to uphold the principles of social justice and right to a healthy environment.
Co-Authors Agus Satory Darmawan , Iwan Iwan Darmawan