Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Symbiotic Dance – How Agile Supply Chains and Strategic Marketing Orchestrate Brand Responsiveness to Evolving Consumer Demands Dzreke, Simon; Dzreke, Semefa Elikplim
Advances in Business & Industrial Marketing Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): June - September
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Bukhari Dwi Muslim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60079/abim.v3i3.624

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate the Adaptive Brand Ecosystem model, a new framework that integrates marketing intelligence with agile supply chain execution to enhance organizational responsiveness and competitiveness. It hypothesizes that tighter integration between marketing and operations leads to superior market performance and customer retention. Research Design and Methodology: The research employed a quantitative design using cross-sectional data from 214 companies across various global markets. Performance indicators such as response speed, inventory turnover, and customer retention were analyzed to measure the impact of marketing–supply chain integration. Additionally, case studies from Zara and Warby Parker were used to provide qualitative insights into real-world applications of adaptive capabilities. Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that firms with strong marketing–operations integration respond 68% faster to market changes, achieve 28% higher inventory turnover, and retain 22% more customers than competitors. The analysis highlights how dynamic market-sensing capabilities restructure supply chains to translate consumer insights into operational advantages. Implications: The model provides executives with strategic guidance for building co-evolving marketing and supply chain systems and introduces tools such as the Demand Response Scorecard. For academics, theory advances by linking dynamic capabilities, market orientation, and operational flexibility, promoting a shift from market-responsiveness to market-propulsion.
The Credibility Gap: Why 68% of Marketers Reject Superior AI Reports (200-CMO Blind Test) Dzreke, Simon; Dzreke, Semefa Elikplim
Advances in Business & Industrial Marketing Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): June - September
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Bukhari Dwi Muslim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60079/abim.v3i3.625

Abstract

Purpose: A significant paradox undercuts artificial intelligence's promise in strategic marketing: while 92% of organizations already use AI-generated insights, 74% of executives distrust them for crucial decisions. Research Design and Methodology: This study addresses the credibility dilemma by conducting a groundbreaking blind test with 200 Chief Marketing Officers from Fortune 500 companies, analyzing identical business challenges—half answered by premier AI platforms (GPT-4 and custom LLMs), and half by experienced human analysts. Findings and Discussion: The technique found an unexpected discrepancy: whereas NLP assessment indicated AI matched or exceeded human report quality in 82% of cases, displaying higher predictive accuracy (+14%) and data comprehensiveness, executives rejected 68% of algorithmically generated insights. A multivariate study identified explanatory inadequacies as the crucial factor: AI's inability to communicate why patterns mattered (causal reasoning), base discoveries in operational realities (contextual framing), and structure insights coherently (narrative flow) accounted for 53% of the trust gap. This "analytics without understanding" dilemma was evident when CMOs ignored an AI report accurately predicting telecom churn because it overlooked how back-to-school tuition payments stretched household budgets—the explanation that made the helpful finding. The study proposes a hybrid approach that adds human-authored "why explanations" (about 47 words) to AI outputs, increasing adoption intent by 40% while maintaining 60% efficiency improvements. Implications: These findings suggest viewing algorithm aversion as a fundamental epistemic reconciliation challenge—one where narrative intelligence links computational power and human judgment. As AI affects strategic decision-making, this study gives a trust calibration plan for maximizing its potential while maintaining interpretative depth.
Synergizing Sustainability: Integrated Demand-Supply Strategies for Resilient Retail, Transport, and Logistics Systems Dzreke, Simon Suwanzy; Dzreke, Semefa Elikplim
Maroon Journal De Management Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maroon Journal De Management (MJDM)
Publisher : Generasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/mjdm.v3i1.302

Abstract

Global supply chains confront existential threats from climate volatility manifest in port-crippling storms and agricultural collapse and chronic disruptions spanning pandemics to geopolitical fragmentation, exposing the fragility of efficiency-optimized models. This research pioneers integrated computational frameworks that transcend disciplinary silos to synchronize environmental sustainability with operational resilience across retail, transport, and logistics ecosystems. Multi-method analysis combining Life Cycle Assessment, Agent-Based Modelling, and policy scenario testing demonstrates that harmonized demand-supply coordination consistently outperforms isolated interventions. Synchronized demand shaping (e.g., AI-facilitated circular consumption) and regionalized supply redesign (e.g., micro-factories) reduce end-to-end emissions by 30–40%, while dynamic AI routing cuts logistics costs by 22% during severe disruptions. Integrating policy instruments like harmonized carbon accounting amplifies stakeholder ROI by 2.8× versus fragmented approaches. The framework empowers industry and policymakers to co-optimize decarbonization and disruption preparedness, transforming brittle networks into adaptive, low-carbon value chains resilient to systemic shocks a strategic imperative beyond incremental adjustment.
Alexa, Reshape My Supply Chain: How Voice Commerce Alters Demand Forecasting, Fulfillment Speed, and Marketing Messaging Dzreke, Simon; Dzreke, Semefa Elikplim
Maroon Journal De Management Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Maroon Journal De Management (MJDM)
Publisher : Generasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/mjdm.v3i1.303

Abstract

The simple utterance "Alexa, order more batteries!" triggers significant operational discontinuities across global supply chains. Voice commerce, now constituting 35% of smart speaker interactions, fundamentally restructures retail logistics, consumer expectations, and marketing psychology. With 47% of voice orders demanding last-minute, low-margin essentials like toilet paper or allergy medicine, traditional demand forecasting succumbs to pronounced "voice shock," characterized by 27% higher volatility spikes concentrated within narrow 15-minute windows. Analysis of 2.3 million anonymized voice transactions, combined with eye-tracking studies of 450 participants and logistics simulations, reveals a critical shift: consumers now expect 2-hour delivery for voice-activated purchases, representing a 96% compression from the established 2-day standard for mobile or web orders. This heightened urgency necessitates hyperlocal fulfillment pods within five miles of users, demonstrably outperforming regional warehouses by reducing delivery failures by 44%. Critically, sonic marketing adheres to a strict "3-second rule," where audio advertisements exceeding this duration experience 62% abandonment. This research introduces a voice-optimized framework demonstrating how enterprises can leverage micro-fulfillment algorithms, ethical conversational design, and predictive audio mnemonics to convert voice-induced operational chaos into sustainable competitive advantage. The era of voice-driven supply chains represents a contemporary imperative.