Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kewarganegara Indonesia (jupenkei)
Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hak Kewarganegaraan dan Penguasaan Sumber Daya Agraria: Perspektif Keadilan Sosial Muhamad Fatih Al Farizy; Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani; Uswatun Hasanah
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kewarganegara Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kewarganegara Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/jupenkei.v2i3.702

Abstract

Citizenship rights and control of agrarian resources are two interrelated aspects in realizing social justice in Indonesia. In the context of an agrarian country experiencing pressures from economic globalization and resource liberalization, unequal access to land and other agrarian resources has become a pressing structural issue. This study aims to analyze how citizenship rights—as a form of state recognition of the existence and participation of citizens—correlate with the distribution and control of agrarian resources, particularly within the framework of social justice. The method used is a qualitative approach with literature studies and critical analysis of agrarian policies, citizenship regulations, and case studies of agrarian conflicts in several regions of Indonesia. The results show that the neglect of citizenship rights in agrarian policies contributes to the marginalization of vulnerable groups, such as indigenous communities and small farmers. Furthermore, land tenure policies that tend to favor corporations reinforce structural inequality. In conclusion, social justice in the control of agrarian resources requires the integration of substantive recognition of citizenship rights and agrarian reform oriented towards redistribution and participation. Policy reform that guarantees equal access to resources for all citizens is a primary prerequisite for inclusive and equitable development.    
Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak di Pengadilan Agama: Rekonstruksi Prinsip Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Berbasis Pancasila dan Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory Evelyn Hatiku; Ismi Arinal Mufidati; Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani; Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v3i2.1754

Abstract

Child custody disputes in Indonesia’s Religious Courts constitute a significant domain of Islamic family law, particularly given the escalating rate of marital dissolution and the increasingly complex social fabric of contemporary society. In practice, decisions regarding custody (ḥaḑānah) remain largely anchored in normative-textual paradigms—such as the child’s age or the presumed primacy of maternal care—without holistically evaluating the principle of the best interests of the child. This gap between legal norms, Pancasila values, and the lived realities of Indonesian families calls for critical reassessment. This research seeks to reconstruct the best interests of the child principle within Religious Court proceedings through an integrative framework that draws upon Pancasila values and Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence theory. A qualitative methodology combining normative-juridical and socio-legal approaches is employed, encompassing statutory analysis, judicial decision review, and engagement with relevant scholarly literature. Findings indicate that the application of the best interests principle remains fragmented, insufficiently addressing psychological, sociological, and cultural dimensions. The proposed reconstruction foregrounds the integration of humanitarian values, social justice, and divine principles enshrined in Pancasila alongside a contextually adaptive Islamic legal methodology. This envisions judges not merely as law appliers, but as agents of social equity who champion the comprehensive well-being of children. This study concludes that a reconstructive paradigm grounded in Pancasila and Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence can substantially enhance child rights protection and facilitate judicial outcomes that are more equitable, compassionate, and oriented toward children’s flourishing.
Co-Authors Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha Evelyn Hatiku Ismi Arinal Mufidati Muhamad Fatih Al Farizy USWATUN HASANAH