Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Evelyn Hatiku
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematika Kewarganegaraan dalam Perkawinan Beda Agama : Perspektif Hukum Nasional dan Hak Asasi Manusia Evelyn Hatiku; Syifa Hauna Nur Syahidah; Muhammad Oriza Pradana
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1335

Abstract

This study examines the complex issue of citizenship in interfaith marriages within Indonesia’s legal and human rights framework. The problem arises from the absence of explicit provisions in national law regarding the civil registration and citizenship consequences of marriages between individuals of different religions. This legal ambiguity often results in unequal recognition, difficulties in registering children’s citizenship, and broader implications for the right to identity. The research aims to analyze how Indonesian marriage law, administrative population law, and judicial interpretations interact with international and constitutional human rights principles. Using a normative juridical method combined with case study analysis and doctrinal review, this study identifies legal inconsistencies between national regulations and the principle of non-discrimination guaranteed under human rights law. The findings indicate that judicial practices, such as post-SEMA No. 2 of 2023 rulings, show a gradual shift toward balancing legal certainty with human rights protection, although disparities persist across jurisdictions. The study concludes that reform is required to clarify the status of interfaith marriages and to protect the citizenship rights of all parties involved, including children. It recommends that legislators harmonize marriage and citizenship laws with constitutional mandates and human rights instruments to ensure equality before the law, legal certainty, and respect for individual freedoms.
Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak di Pengadilan Agama: Rekonstruksi Prinsip Kepentingan Terbaik Anak Berbasis Pancasila dan Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory Evelyn Hatiku; Ismi Arinal Mufidati; Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani; Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v3i2.1754

Abstract

Child custody disputes in Indonesia’s Religious Courts constitute a significant domain of Islamic family law, particularly given the escalating rate of marital dissolution and the increasingly complex social fabric of contemporary society. In practice, decisions regarding custody (ḥaḑānah) remain largely anchored in normative-textual paradigms—such as the child’s age or the presumed primacy of maternal care—without holistically evaluating the principle of the best interests of the child. This gap between legal norms, Pancasila values, and the lived realities of Indonesian families calls for critical reassessment. This research seeks to reconstruct the best interests of the child principle within Religious Court proceedings through an integrative framework that draws upon Pancasila values and Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence theory. A qualitative methodology combining normative-juridical and socio-legal approaches is employed, encompassing statutory analysis, judicial decision review, and engagement with relevant scholarly literature. Findings indicate that the application of the best interests principle remains fragmented, insufficiently addressing psychological, sociological, and cultural dimensions. The proposed reconstruction foregrounds the integration of humanitarian values, social justice, and divine principles enshrined in Pancasila alongside a contextually adaptive Islamic legal methodology. This envisions judges not merely as law appliers, but as agents of social equity who champion the comprehensive well-being of children. This study concludes that a reconstructive paradigm grounded in Pancasila and Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence can substantially enhance child rights protection and facilitate judicial outcomes that are more equitable, compassionate, and oriented toward children’s flourishing.
Co-Authors Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha Ayu Dwi Kusuma Wardani Ismi Arinal Mufidati Muhammad Oriza Pradana Syifa Hauna Nur Syahidah