Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum J-CEKI
Opsunggu, Eben Patar
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Penanganan Korupsi dalam Sistem Civil Law dengan Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Belanda Opsunggu, Eben Patar; Hoesein, Zainal Arifin
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 6: Oktober 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i6.12871

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis penanganan korupsi dalam konteks sistem Civil Law, dengan fokus komparatif antara Indonesia dan Belanda. Indonesia, yang mengadopsi prinsip Civil Law dari warisan kolonial Belanda melalui KUHP dan UU Tipikor, menghadapi tantangan dalam penerapan hukum tertulis akibat koordinasi antar-lembaga yang terbatas, tekanan politik, dan variabilitas kepatuhan aparat publik. Sebaliknya, Belanda menerapkan mekanisme formal yang sistematis, termasuk KUHP Belanda, Dutch Public Administration Act, audit internal oleh Algemene Rekenkamer, mekanisme transparansi, dan whistleblowing, yang memastikan penegakan hukum dan pencegahan korupsi efektif. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan komparatif, menelaah dasar hukum, prosedur penyidikan, penuntutan, persidangan, serta mekanisme pencegahan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan sistem Civil Law tidak hanya bergantung pada hukum tertulis, tetapi juga pada integritas lembaga, efektivitas prosedur, dan adaptasi terhadap konteks sosial-politik. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pengembangan teori hukum positif serta rekomendasi praktis untuk reformasi hukum anti-korupsi di Indonesia.
Regulatory Harmonization of Plea Bargaining for Petty Corruption in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Opsunggu, Eben Patar; Budianto , Azis
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.450

Abstract

The eradication of corruption in Indonesia continues to face structural challenges, particularly in the handling of petty corruption cases that involve relatively small state losses but consume disproportionate law enforcement resources. This study aims to analyze the urgency, feasibility, and regulatory implications of implementing a plea bargaining mechanism as an alternative resolution model for petty corruption cases within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research examines relevant laws, including the Anti-Corruption Law, the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and the Prosecutor’s Office Law, as well as comparative practices from the United States, Italy, and the Philippines. The findings indicate that the absence of explicit legal regulation has resulted in procedural rigidity, inefficiency, and suboptimal recovery of state losses in minor corruption cases. Plea bargaining, if strictly limited and transparently regulated, has the potential to enhance legal efficiency, prioritize restitution of state losses, reduce judicial and correctional burdens, and support a more restorative justice orientation. This study concludes that regulatory harmonization through limited revisions to the Corruption Law and KUHAP, complemented by clear prosecutorial guidelines issued by the Attorney General’s Office, is essential to ensure accountability, legal certainty, and public trust. Properly designed plea bargaining should be positioned not as a form of impunity, but as a strategic instrument to optimize corruption eradication while upholding substantive justice and the rule of law.
Co-Authors Budianto , Azis Zainal Arifin Hoesein